 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Not quite, doofus. It's in fact illogical to accuse someone without any proof. |
Hey! then stop accusing Al-Qaeda!
No one has accused ETA. Still they are the candidates number one and the more than probable responsible. If I had to bet my money I would say it was ETA, total or partially responsible.
Anyway, when you donīt have probes. And even if you have, is good to use logic. Logic says that it would be so convenient 3 days before the elections that the guilty were Al-Qaeda and not ETA. And logic says that the groups against government are ready to bash the governing party like they have been doing all this year. They donīt mind using death people to achieve their goals.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Terrorism is a sad thing, but sometimes people are just looking for it. National autonomous movements are valid causes IMO, and those who don't want to recognize them are exposing themselves to risks. |
Very democratic way of thinking. Next time I want something that the majority of people donīt want, I will put a pair of bombs.
quote: This said, it seems like 'negociating' with terrorists can be successful, as demonstrated by the massive opposition to the terror act in Basque territory. |
False. Look at the statistics. They have the most autonomy in history. They are not happy. Look at the news for it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Merciless
4. Van found with detonators and Arabic Koran tape.
|
Sorry, but this doesnīt demonstrates anything. They could have been placed by ETA people just to disguise it. They could knew that there are a lot of people willing to blame Bush and Aznar (sorry, I mean Al Qaeda) for the dead people. Thatīs the perfect strike. People day and government loses elections.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
For example, we might say of a little 11-years old girl with very sexy clothes (perhaps too sexy for her age) walking alone at 1 AM in the street of a poor ghetto that she has a rape coming. |
:-O So the people who invented that burka idea were in fact worried about womenīs security.
quote: That doesn't make raping her morally acceptable. |
But justifies laws forbidding women to dress like the want to dress. Isnīt it? In democracy people can dress as they want to, as long as it isnīt offensive. Thatīs the basis of democracy, giving freedom to people to act and fo what they want as long as they follow minimum rules of respect to the other citizens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BeBro
|
 |
of the Krauts
Mar 2000 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Now, say that X and Y start a brawl in a bar. X is at -50, and so is Y. Does that mean that both can substract the other's morality rating to theirs, so that they are in fact at 0? Nope. They are both a -50.
Now, say the terrorists are at -100, and the innocent people at -2. Am I implying that in fact the terrorists should be considered at -98? Not at all. |
The problem is that in praxis similar thinking is indeed used to justify acts of terror. After sep.11 there were AQ letters published in Arab media which said pretty much "its their own fault". That is a standard argument in terrorist reasoning, much older than AQ terror, because as a terrorist you must convince yourself somehow that you're right in killing your victims. If you can't do that, your own legitimation falls down.
So, I don't doubt it when you say you will not excuse or justify anything, still I can't oversee that others do so with similar reasoning.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Timexwatch
The politics of ETA depends on what you read. They may have been leftist at one time, but nowadays, at least from the academic analysis that Iīve been reading, theyīve skewed more towards a rightist slant with ethnic undertones to their claims. |
ETA is leftist nationalism. They are Castroīs friends. PNV is rightist nationalism. In any case, political ideas (right or left) are in second place, and the important thing for them are obtaining the independence (and their little piece of power, their seat at UN, etc, etc) at any means.
quote: Spanish nationalism, since the La Pepa constitution, has been liberal, but Catalan nationalism and, IIRC, Basque nationalism has been conservative. |

quote: Nowadays Catalan nationalism is more leftist (ERC) than anything. Iīm not aware of any rightist Catalan Nationalists. |
CiU, the party in power of the Catalan government for 23 years (until past Autumn) is conservative.
quote: The number of Herri Batasuana seats in the Cortes reached a high of 8 (in the mid-80s and over 60% of the Pais Vasco and Navarre seats) but has dropped to nothing. |
They didnīt participate in the elections of 4 years ago. Thatīs the reason.
quote: Right now, at least from unbiased interpretations of Euskal Barometer, 20% of Pais Vasco residents are hardcore ETA/Independence supporters. There is a vocal minority that terrorizes the majority, including the Castillian speaking people who live there. There is daily low intensity violence from polarized youth that stalls any political resolution. |

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
This should be interesting. Explain how the people working in the World Trade Center or on those planes had it coming. |
I will answer this, but only if you take the time to answer my other previous question.
OK.
International realpolitik usually takes a 'whole country' for responsible of something- or, at least, it has to suppose that the effects on the innocent are meaningless.
If you look at what the American sanctions did to Iraq, or the humanitarian disaster in Afghanistan, or the effects of the Sudan bombing on thousands of children, you have a perfect example of this. The difference being, of course, that the Afghani peasants had no influence on Bin Laden, and that Iraqi children had nothing to do with the Gulf War, while the American people in general supported many of the terrorist acts of its government, and even voted for it.
In some cases, the link between terrorists and American action is direct (the mudjahidins). In most cases, it is indirect- terrorism springs from the political climate which has in part been created by American action.
If a moral action with a mostly negative value (supporting Bush) will knowingly result in another action with also a negative value (terrorism), then those who commited the first action are partly responsible, not only from a causal viewpoint, but also from a moral one.
From there, the 'had it coming' is mainly statistical: most people in the WTC were morally contributing to a climate favorable to terrorism: voting for terrorist parties, buying slave-labor stuff, etc. There will always be some innocents: but since America ignored them in their quest to hurt Saddam or the Taliban, you can't sincerely expect Al-Qaeda not to ignore them in their quest to hurt America.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|