 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
Just to clarify a bit about the left/right subject... ETA is extreme left. They are being supported by the right independentist party (currently in basque government). When left and right get extreme, both are autoritarian. Anyway, you cannot do much right politics when you get autoritarian, but they think they can.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by OliverFA
Just to clarify a bit about the left/right subject... ETA is extreme left. They are being supported by the right independentist party (currently in basque government). When left and right get extreme, both are autoritarian. Anyway, you cannot do much right politics when you get autoritarian, but they think they can. |
EXACTLY!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
You sidestepped the whole thread just to attack me Winston. Has happened before. Should I just call you a nazi again and have Ming here so he can put some order? Or are you ready to do it yourself?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by OliverFA
Just to clarify a bit about the left/right subject... ETA is extreme left. They are being supported by the right independentist party (currently in basque government). When left and right get extreme, both are autoritarian. Anyway, you cannot do much right politics when you get autoritarian, but they think they can. |
Self provingly right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jamski
Why were the Spanish so quick to jump to the wrong conclusion (ETA) ? The German news reported it as a possible Al-Q action right from the start.
These poor ETA guys nearly got the blame right before the elections. |
Very nice way of talking about assassins. "Those poor guys".
Maybe tomorrow we are saying "Why was Jamski too quick to jump over the Spanish governemnt?".
Everyone in Spain (even the people who know say it was Al-Qaeda) thought it was ETA. It was (and still is) the logical conclussion. They have been trying to do it for many months and the city of Madrid represents everything ETA hates.
The government itself has recognized that there are some clues that could point to Al-Qaeda. So they are not as immobilistic and some people want to picture them. Also, the government says (and itīs the logical thing) that the primary suspect is still ETA.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JCG
Blame TV, newspapers, the internet and the polls, not me.
And lest you forget, you don't have a crystall ball either, do you? |
Iīm tired to hear what "catalan people" think. I am starting to wonder if I am Catalan, because I never agree with what "catalan people" think.
Iīm tired to hear at polls that everybody dislikes PP and then they always win.
Consequently, polls donīt have much value for me. In both senses. I didnīt say that people were in favour. I just say that it cannot be said that they were against. You can say that people who was in the street was against the war. But what about people at home? Itīs very dangerous to substitute real democracy (what people votes at elections) by polls and interpretations of public opinion made by "experts".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by M'sieur Baise
Let's suppose it's Al-Quaeda. I guess most of you guys will still agree with Bush's post-9/11 policy, and probably with even more conviction.
Please. "Explain" this to me. |
I will explain it with a question: In which way a policy oposed to that of Mr. Bush will help preventing this kind of attacks?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
M'sieur Baise
|
 |
Guantanamo
Mar 2004 time: 05:34
|
|
quote: I will explain it with a question: In which way a policy oposed to that of Mr. Bush will help preventing this kind of attacks? |
How original.
I thought I asked a question, but hey. I'm not going to get in the little game and throw back another question.
You guys mentionned earlier how you were surprised of the attack taking place in a train. Originally, the bombs were set to explode when the train was in the station . But because the train had a few minutes delay, it exploded at a reasonable distance from the station. Now imagine the number of deaths if the bombs had exploded 2 minutes later.
Remember that Al-Quaeda is able to recruit people willing to die for their cause. Even with a tight security, anything can happen. Will it be in a subway station or in new year's eve, when hundreds of thousands new yorkers are gathered to celebrate, there will always be chances that a terrorist act may happen, despite all the airport security, surveillance cameras and snipers.
Let's be realistic. Even by increasing military spending each year, to the point of assraping its own economy, the U.S. cannot toss every terrorist in Guantanamo. The 9/11 attacks cost a grand total of 500,000$ for Al-Quaeda. That, and few men. With a little money, a good plan, and a few damaged braincells, it's that easy to bring a country to its knees.
OK, Oliver. I didn't answer the question. But that was the point, no?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|