 |
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
So, after reading through 7 pages of this thread, I HAD to ask...
Where's the link to the terrorists claiming victory?
Spanish troops, right now, are in Iraq. And they will stay there until at least June. They could stay there for far longer if the UN wants to get involved in sorting the political dimension (and of course, the Bushies will permit such "meddling" in their conquest).
Those who love democracy cannot criticise the Spanish people's decision.
Those who think Spain will do nothing do not know the Spanish.
Iraq is but one one front on a global battlefield.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
Kidicious: Please vote for Bush. I can only chuckle to see you and some of the conservatives agreeing election time-it will make them feel so icky...
I will do an TMM and repeat for the nth time:
80-90% of the people in Spain did not back the war in Iraq-. IF the PP was going to win, it was going to be due to it's internal policies, NOT its external policies. The Madrid bombing showed its external policies to be, if not a failure, unable to keep Spain safe. Fez said there was nothing any government could have done to stop that bombing-if that is true, what the hell did the PP do for 2 plus years as part on this war on terror? And how would a continuation of the highly unpopular participation of Spain in Iraq without a UN mandate make Spain and spaniards any safer against AQ?
People ask why the government would go whole hog to blame ETA-well, if we were to bring out the threads form that day of the attack-I could point to where I said I found the gov. blaming ETA strange becuase this had the AQ MO. During that discussion, I brought this up, and in one exchange OliverFA, who was blaming, like the government, ETA stated that if it came out it had been AQ there was a possibility the people would vote against the government. All that the day of the attack.
I do not buy the explination that Spanish anger at the PP was due solely to the foolish government handling of events-this outcome as a possibility could be seen. But I find the arguement this is a victory for the terrorist absurd-and one used simply as a proxy for the Iraq debate.
On the notion this will lead to more attacks-why the F*** does anyone here think Terrorists do attack? by this logic, after 9/11 AQ should have figured out attacks would all backfire-somehow they have failed to get the clue, no? Terrorist can always look back to Reagan running from Lebanon after a few massive bombings to see the power of attacks.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|