 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Most of her recent column is on Rathergate, but she ends on this note, which identifies why CBS screwed up and why Cronkite was critical to America losing the Vietnam war.
"The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth show the role of the individual in history. It wasn't Republican strategists who finished Kerry off two months before the election; it was the American people. The Swift Boat veterans came along and kicked Kerry in the shins and no matter how much heat they took, they were brave and wouldn't give up. |
Yup to that, the ads and the GOP convention did Kerry in... Bush will win by %3-4 at least.
quote: The veterans who served with Kerry told the truth and the American people listened (as soon as they managed to locate a copy of "Unfit for Command" hidden on one of the back shelves at their local bookstores). |
Which veterans? There seems to be two contrasting versions and the other is positive, that and the obvious motive the SBVT have to get back at Kerry for what he said back then leaves us nowhere. How does she "know" the truth when even the people who were there can't agree on what happened?
quote: CBS was forced to run a fake story so early in the campaign that it was exposed as a fraud – only because of the Swift Boat vets. These brave men, many of them decorated war heroes, have now not only won the election for Bush, they have ended Dan Rather's career. |
Payback's a *****
quote: It's often said that we never lost a battle in Vietnam, but that the war was lost at home by a seditious media demoralizing the American people. Ironically, the leader of that effort was Rather's predecessor at CBS News, Walter Cronkite, president of the Ho Chi Minh Admiration Society.
It was Cronkite who went on air and lied about the Tet offensive, claiming it was a defeat for the Americans. He told the American people the war was over and we had lost. Ronald Reagan said CBS News officials should have been tried for treason for those broadcasts. |
We lost that war the minute the CinC et al decided it was to be a "limited" war like in Korea which turned into a stalemate ended Eisenhower. The US had never lost a war up until then but nukes not only induce peace among the empowered, they result in limited wars in someone else's backyard. Oops, and that's what leads to terrorists and then to terrorists with nukes. 
quote: CBS has already lost one war for America. The Swift Boat Vets weren't going to let CBS lose another one." |
Ouch, well put even if it's debatable...
http://www.anncoulter.org/ [/QUOTE]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
How convenient, you actually linked to it yourself. Well, then go ahead and pull out the parts where they want to repeal NAFTA, ratify Kyoto, remove military recruiters, etc. |
Here's a bit on Kyoto...
quote: “When Bill Clinton needed support on tough and politically difficult issues like climate change, the one person we could always count on was John Kerry. He came to every round of negotiations over the Kyoto Protocol all around the world and was a strong voice for action. He was always out-numbered by corporate lobbyists and opponents of environmental progress, but he never back down. He not only has vision, he has guts.”
-- Roger Ballentine, Former Director- White House Office on Climate Change
|
http://www.johnkerry.com/communitie...mentalists.html
quote: “Bush’s abrupt and unilateral decision to abandon discussions with the world community on climate change was early evidence of this Administration’s misguided approach to dealing with the community of nations. Dropping out of international implementation of the Kyoto Protocol was foolhardy then, and it is even more obviously foolhardy today. In our absence, many of our major trading partners in Europe and elsewhere have been working on the details of international programs to manage greenhouse gas emissions. American interests are on the sidelines, having no ability to influence the development of a system that will profoundly affect the global approach to resource protection and investment in climate change technologies….”
|
http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=622
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
Ben, I'm still waiting for you to respond to my points. A simple admission of defeat would be fine. Frankly, I'm getting sick of you getting your ass handed to you in a debate only to turn around and present the same arguments at a later date, pretending you weren't beaten down in the first place.
So, for the last time, either actually defend your position that the CPUSA and Democratic platforms have no differences between them, or admit that you made a blatently false statement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
I still don't see where Kerry says he will ratify Kyoto, but I don't mind conceding this point since it has no bearing on my argument.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
Which means that he would seek to repeal NAFTA how? Do you understand what repeal means?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
Sorry, just trying on BK logic for size. Doesn't fit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
Ben, I'm still waiting for you to respond to my points. A simple admission of defeat would be fine. Frankly, I'm getting sick of you getting your ass handed to you in a debate only to turn around and present the same arguments at a later date, pretending you weren't beaten down in the first place.
So, for the last time, either actually defend your position that the CPUSA and Democratic platforms have no differences between them, or admit that you made a blatently false statement. |
Kontiki, you must admit, though, to a certain congruency. The Dems cannot be as extreme as the Commies -- otherwise they couldn't win any elections. So they sugarcoat their programs with moderate words, but their actions in power are indistinguishable from what the communists would do:
1) continue to erode the family by any number of initiatives;
2) hike taxes on the rich to make the taxes progressive and restore death tax confiscations;
3) reduce the influence of religion and to ostracize it;
4) reduce or eliminate property rights;
5) support organized labor above all;
6) reduce free trade between nations; and, above all else,
7) reduce the military power of the United States.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
Sorry, just trying on BK logic for size. Doesn't fit. |
Ben's mistake was that he opened his argument by implying that the democrats and the commies were almost identical.
Obviously there are differences, but in the issues that matter to me most (taxation, immigration) they are very similar.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Kontiki, you must admit, though, to a certain congruency. The Dems cannot be as extreme as the Commies -- otherwise they couldn't win any elections. So they sugarcoat their programs with moderate words, but their actions in power are indistinguishable from what the communists would do:
1) continue to erode the family by any number of initiatives;
2) hike taxes on the rich to make the taxes progressive and restore death tax confiscations;
3) reduce the influence of religion and to ostracize it;
4) reduce or eliminate property rights;
5) support organized labor above all;
6) reduce free trade between nations; and, above all else,
7) reduce the military power of the United States. |
The only thing I must admit is the high probability that one of your posts will make me burst out laughing. And yet again, you don't disappoint!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|