 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:21
|
|
OK OK, since there has been some claims that French resistance WAS the allied, I mean that's the claim, if they are part of allied then they are allied. My claim is, they were helping allied, and were part of the effort, but their own entity (I dont' know what is so difficult understanding this):
Wikipedia says:
The French Resistance was the resistance movement that fought military occupation of France by Nazi Germany and the resulting Vichy France during World War II after France surrendered in 1940. French Resistance cooperated with Allied secret services (see Special Operations Executive), especially in providing intelligence on the Atlantic Wall and coordinating sabotages and other actions to contribute to the success of Operation Overlord.
This clearly says that they were their own entity, and NOT allied per se. Now, go fetch your fishy sources of information and .. **** I dont' even feel like debating this, I think this is so trivial.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jaguar
|
 |
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
OK OK, since there has been some claims that French resistance WAS the allied, I mean that's the claim, if they are part of allied then they are allied. My claim is, they were helping allied, and were part of the effort, but their own entity (I dont' know what is so difficult understanding this):
Wikipedia says:
The French Resistance was the resistance movement that fought military occupation of France by Nazi Germany and the resulting Vichy France during World War II after France surrendered in 1940. French Resistance cooperated with Allied secret services (see Special Operations Executive), especially in providing intelligence on the Atlantic Wall and coordinating sabotages and other actions to contribute to the success of Operation Overlord.
This clearly says that they were their own entity, and NOT allied per se. Now, go fetch your fishy sources of information and .. **** I dont' even feel like debating this, I think this is so trivial. |
1. It does not clearly say that.
2. Wikipedia isn't God.
3. Look at the word. Allied forces. As in forces who were allied with each other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Oh who ****ing cares?!
Even if we go with Cheney's definition, which is totally valid, that just means that a whole shitload of Iraqis are dying. This is supposed to be a good thing?
Seems pretty even so far. Both have landed some pretty good zingers and some solid arguments, and both have stumbled on occasion. Slight edge to Cheney at the moment, simply for stumbling slightly less than Edwards.
What is abundantly clear is that Bush is obviously the worst debater of the four, and that the debate is much more interesting when the candidates actually, you know, debate.
I'd actually rather Cheney be President over Bush, for the simple reason that it makes me uncomfortable that the President of the United States of America is a complete ****wit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|