 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
wait, I am not following you people on that discussion: what do you peopel think causes "corporate flight", and what is it? |
Flight is the movement of businesses to third-world nations from the US and Europe etc. The cause is lesser labor costs, less taxes and less environmental or other compliance regulation
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
See, here's my big problem...my main beef.
Let us start with the Big Red Mantra that Labor is precious. Labor is all there is. The Alpha and the Omega. Labor is precious.
Mmmmkay! Got it. Right. Labor = Good.
Including my labor.
Which is why, I suppose, on the day of the Revolution, men with guns will come to remove me from my home.
MY home.
The home I sweated and bled out my....(here comes that word again) LABOR to purchase.
So maybe my labor isn't held in quite as much esteem. It would seem not. But yeah....since I have a nicer home than the whiney party faithful down the block, I OBVIOUSLY used some wicked and nefarious means of acquiring it. I couldn't possibly have come by it fairly....which I suppose, makes it okay to come and rob me.
Makes it easier to live with, tellin yourself that, anyways.
Your Revolution promises to toss my capitalist a$$ in some state run housing project and put a party faithful in the house that MY labor bought and paid for.
And justice for all, right? Uh huh.
Again...I think I'll pass.
-=Vel=- |
No one is going to throw you out of your house bud, but I'm reconsidering you as a communist. You definitely have a way with words.
Last edited by Kidicious on 11-12-2004 at 05:24
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:17
|
|

Che tells me to stop assuming. He tells me that he's not going to steal my home....unless of course I have more than one....cos I don't NEED more than one.
So....in the absence of ANY substance from team red regarding a tangible, solid PLAN for how the revolution will play out (other than "trust us...we'll learn from our mistakes and get it right next time."), I'm not allowed to draw on actual historical references regarding property ownership (a big no-no under Red Theory), but somehow, as if by magic, it's okay for Che to tell me what I do and do not need (because of course, he, as the author of one version of the infinitely benevolent and all-knowing state, he is obviously in a better position to know my needs than I am).
MmmmHmmm.
I begin to see the light. 
Oh...and the "allowing several commie states to come up with their own implementation"....won't work.
Why?
Because the GOAL of communism is global implementation.
It is self defeating to have several disparate states, each in control of only a portion of global resources, because this would, by definition, lead to market dynamics...a thing we must avoid at all costs!
Therefore, the inescapable conclusion is that all resources much be controlled from and by a singular point.
There will BE no mass conglomeration of red states, because there can be no such beast under the paradigm. It would lead to that dreaded and awful creature called "competition" and THAT in turn, could lead to exploitation. Can't have that.
The reason that communal/utopic living works on a small (tribal) scale is THE VERY SAME reason that it falls apart at the macro level. There's no such thing as a "classless" society. If you remove economic incentive, it will simply manifest itself in other ways. You can't escape the beast, so there's not much need to try. It is a fundamental waste of time and effort.
That effort is FAR better spent in working on ways of minimizing those differences by providing and creating an environment filled with opportunity, NOT by pandering to the lowest common denominator.
There's just not a plainer way to say it.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
So tell me, Kid, when, precisely, have I exploited you?
Please fill me in, cos to my knowledge, you and I have never met?
Do you have any evidence that I have EVER exploited another human being for gain or profit, or are you just assuming so, because to assume otherwise makes me not quite the monster I guess you secretly hope that I am?
As to strawmen. You're right, of course. No previous implementations of the Big Red Machine have EVER stripped private property from individuals. Collective farms were a myth, right?
But yes...I'm grasping at straws, because land is not, and cannot be used as a "means of production", so of course there's no fear that my home will be taken from me, right?
Pick one. Decide. Stick with it. 
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
One thing your "exploitation" model misses, by the way, UR, is the fact that without some one, or some group of someone to BUILD the factory or other implements of production, there would BE no jobs, or rather, there would be a collection of in-home shops which are grossly more inefficient and do not lend themselves to economies of scale.
Thus, those who build the plants and factories and places where all the lovely stuff we are using RIGHT NOW to even HOLD this conversation in the first place are, I repeat ARE entitled to some form of gain for expending THEIR labor (expressed in dollars spent, as dollars are a portable store of accumulated labor, among other things) in return for the expenditure.
To do anything less than grant them a boon for enabling the jobs in the first would be an exploitation of THEM and their labor, and we can't have that either.
Time value of money isn't a myth. If you believe it to be so, please empty your bank account immediately and send me a check.
I'll pay you back....eventually...and with no interest.
Sound like a good deal to you? NO? Why not?
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
As to strawmen. You're right, of course. No previous implementations of the Big Red Machine have EVER stripped private property from individuals. Collective farms were a myth, right? |
For your information, Vel, land reforms did not take land from poor peasants, who, in fact, had no land to begin with.
Land was taken from landlords who fattened themselves on the labours of tenant farmers.
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
But yes...I'm grasping at straws, because land is not, and cannot be used as a "means of production", so of course there's no fear that my home will be taken from me, right? |
Yes, in fact, you're attacking strawman again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
One thing your "exploitation" model misses, by the way, UR, is the fact that without some one, or some group of someone to BUILD the factory or other implements of production, there would BE no jobs, or rather, there would be a collection of in-home shops which are grossly more inefficient and do not lend themselves to economies of scale. |
Missed what? You don't think a workers' collective or a state can build factories?
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
Thus, those who build the plants and factories and places where all the lovely stuff we are using RIGHT NOW to even HOLD this conversation in the first place are, I repeat ARE entitled to some form of gain for expending THEIR labor (expressed in dollars spent, as dollars are a portable store of accumulated labor, among other things) in return for the expenditure. |
How did you get from point A to point B again? From where did this "right" come?
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
To do anything less than grant them a boon for enabling the jobs in the first would be an exploitation of THEM and their labor, and we can't have that either. |
Somehow capitalists have the rights to gain -- not just recoup -- from their expenditure of capital, so therefore they are allowed to exploit workers for this gain.
It appears that something is missing in this unassailable piece of logic.
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
Time value of money isn't a myth. If you believe it to be so, please empty your bank account immediately and send me a check.
I'll pay you back....eventually...and with no interest.
Sound like a good deal to you? NO? Why not? |
Again, a worthless piece of fallacy. Asking people to lend you what the can afford, even without interest, is one thing. Asking them to empty their bank accounts is a completely different matter.
I am sure you know this.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|