 |
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:16
|
|
Well indeed nothing's lost yet. If there's a majority for proposing to sell EthCalc to the Gaians, Kassi could always send a second PM.
Edit: I just noticed I already received a PM back from Chaos Theory. Chance for Kassiopeia to take over if you want to.
His reply:
quote: That is accurate. We hear you have likewise agreed not to build the Ascetic Virtues SP. |
Last edited by Maniac on 19-12-2004 at 18:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:16
|
|
I'd like to second Snoddasmannen: While I don't fully understand why you're specifically opposed to this particular trade offer, and while I don't see any big similarities between the Doc:Ini theft and this matter, my attitude is one of "Hey, if you feel so strongly about it, let's do it as you prefer. "
To better understand your position for future reference though, could I ask your thoughts on the following hypothetical scenario?
1) If we had made a research deal with the Angels where they gave us a tech and in return we would give them Mind/Machine Interface after we had researched it a few years down the road,
2) If we are planning to attack the Angels a few turns after having researched MMI and built sufficient choppers and drop troops,
3) If this war will be the final showdown between us and any remaining opposition, the battle to decide who will the game, and we therefore don't expect to do any trading with other factions anymore during the remainder of the game,
would you:
a) break our agreement with the Angels, not give them MMI, and attack them as planned, with increased chances for victory.
b) keep our agreement with the Angels, give them MMI and THEN declare war on them, having fulfilled all our obligations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:16
|
|
The analogy isn't quite the same.
If we owed them a tech down the road, and attacked, then no, I wouldn't send the tech. Much as I wouldn't have expected Morgan to pay us outstanding ec's if they had decided to declare vendetta as a result of our probe actions (the game suspends debt payments during Vendettas - our loan from Zak is still recorded, but with an asterisk)
But the proposal to sell EthCalc to the Gaians, in my view, would break a treaty trade between Treatied partners (Sparta and the Angels). It was negotiated in good faith, and we can't even claim that we didn't know that onward trading of that particular technology at this particular time was a key part of it - it was the deal-enabler, in fact. They told us that, but just were trusting enough not to put a clause in to deny us trying to trade it to the Gaians before they could execute their part of whatever leapfrog they were negotiating with the Gaians.
My view is that if we tried the double cross, then we can forget ever again dealing with the Angels (and I'm not sure that the Gaians would even deal with us anyway, for the sake of saving a few ec's or hoarding a tech from the A's. That'd probably sow such distrust among these 2 that they wouldn't consider it.
So, in a nutshell, I don't see any upside whatsoever, just downsides - the biggest being the loss of honour and credibility for the Spartan Officer negotiating and signing the Angels' deal
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snoddasmannen
|
|
If we could just get reassurance that they and the Angels won't help the Morgans, that would be a great thing. I doubt they have the strength to help us attack though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|