 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:16
|
|
Copied from the MY 2166 planning thread, so we can discuss this longterm strategy discussion here, and keep the planning thread exclusively for the stuff happening this year:
***
Having just looked at the turn (who will play it btw?), I'd even suggest to completely call off the framing operation. 
Why?
The Gaians are in a truce with Yang... I guess the Morganites (or Angels??) asked the Hive to call off their vendetta with the Gaian Union. The Hive has received three new techs this year, so it's clear what they got in return.
This means the AFAIK two goals of framing Morgan would no longer work:
1> Trying to keep DAP out of Weasel hands. Even if we'd manage to frame Morgan, they could still get it from via the Gaians.
2> Let Yang do some dirty work for us by harrassing both the Gaians and Morganites.
Besides, look at the base build list of the Hive. All hab complexes and other builder stuff, for the first time in a couple decades. Do we really want to risk disturb Yang again and throw him back into war mode, this time with a 50% risk he's solely focused on us??
Oh yeah, if the Axis of Weasels does indeed get DAP, I'd return to my previous opinion: an invasion of Terrapeso would be suicide! I'd suggest to call a peace conference with the goal of really trying to sign a peace with the Weasels (or at least the Corporation; it's not like the Gaians can harm us).
Who knows we could still succeed in conquering the Corporation, but there would be little left of them after we're finished with them: they've got only seven size 3 three bases. You have to count two pops are lost to capture a base, so that means we'd get seven extra workers out of the whole operation.
This might still make sense if we were living in the situation of ten years back: The Corporation and Sparta the only great powers, with the Angels and Gaians only as spectators. Then defeating the Corporation could have meant winning the game.
But these last ten years the Angels have been popbooming. They have the same population as the Corporation, and their power bar has grown almost as high as the Morganites as well.
If the Corporation and we keep fighting, the Angels might very well run away with the game since they can keep focusing on builder production.
Therefore I advocate peace, so we can popboom ourselves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
... the turn (who will play it btw?), |
Why don't you go ahead since it's a weekend - I can take over when the turn falls midweek, as I gather that's not so convenient for you
quote: I'd even suggest to completely call off the framing operation. |
I agree - maybe we send that longstrider down to join the Gaian Expeditionary Force
quote: Besides, look at the base build list of the Hive. All hab complexes and other builder stuff, for the first time in a couple decades. Do we really want to risk disturb Yang again and throw him back into war mode, this time with a 50% risk he's solely focused on us?? |
Good point - and with the Angels pop-booming, and the Gaians likely not far behind, we need to focus ourselves on consolidation and pop growth.
This game is far from over, Tassadar's opinions notwithstanding
quote: Oh yeah, if the Axis of Weasels does indeed get DAP, I'd return to my previous opinion: an invasion of Terrapeso would be suicide! I'd suggest to call a peace conference with the goal of really trying to sign a peace with the Weasels (or at least the Corporation; it's not like the Gaians can harm us). |
I agree. Let's crank up the diplomacy to full volume
quote: If the Corporation and we keep fighting, the Angels might very well run away with the game since they can keep focusing on builder production.
Therefore I advocate peace, so we can popboom ourselves. |
I agree. We did strike a major blow in getting rid of the PTS - that maybe cost Morgan the win.
One option left to us is in warring with the PK's, and enslaving them. We need to discuss this. (and as a corollary, do we change to POLICE and try to pact with Yang? - that'd prolly provoke the PK's to declare vendetta on us of their own volition!!)
Alternatively - build creches, change to Dem and Planned, then produce colony pods like crazy as we grow (and maybe gift every third one to the Uni to get them growing too - every lab point they generate is like a super labpoint for us)
We can win by transcendence, with Zak's help
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sentry33
|
 |
Warsaw, Poland
Jun 2004 time: 06:16
|
|
How about we propose peace while our troops are posed to strike another major blow to them? (Are we capable of making such blow? And what it would be - perhaps obliterating important bases?)
What I mean is:
- if they choose peace, we will show good will by withdrawing troops,
- if they refuse, they will suffer.
They can of course be cheating, feigning peace.. but we have infiltration on their build orders, so we are not blind. We can include military build limits in our peace diplomacy.
Last edited by sentry33 on 10-04-2005 at 11:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:16
|
|
Hmm, yeah, taking out Yang might be an idea.
But I agree with Snoddasmannen, I don't like this general shift in direction. While we both know you Googlie and Maniac are good strategists, are you really sure we have a shot at victory if we start to muck about like a headless chicken? "Builder, no, momentum, wait, builder, or maybe momentum, I know, hybrid!, okay, I guess builder".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by sentry33
How about we propose peace while our troops are posed to strike another major blow to them? (Are we capable of making such blow? And what it would be - perhaps obliterating important bases?) |
I checked it a few days ago, and by MY 2169 we could have the Tiger's Claw filled with a probe team and three combat units in Vander Eudaimonics. Nothing more though. 
We could of course exaggerate, and eg say: If you don't agree to a treaty by MY 2169, we will invade at Vander Eudaimonics and Morgan Mussels (if the friendly approach fails of course ).
quote: They can of course be cheating, feigning peace.. but we have infiltration on their build orders, so we are not blind. We can include military build limits in our peace diplomacy. |
Eg they can build as many SAM aircraft as they want, but no offensive needlejets (or only a limited amount to take on Yang if necessary).
quote: Originally posted by Snoddasmannen
So now we are preparing to go builder? I don't know, it sounds like the beginning of the end to me, but the Junta usually knows what it's doing  |
quote: Originally posted by Modo44
Well, IF indeed we can not invade Morgan big time, perhaps we need to consider a different approach after all. BUT, that would mean we need some more prime real estate, to make up for our faction's bad builder capabilities. |
While of course more real estate is always handy (especially the Monsoon Jungle), we don't need it for a succesful builder approach. True, we have a general builder penalty of bad Industry SE. However that doesn't mean the Spartans are completely unsuited for any kind of builder tactic: they can popboom. In fact, after getting Intellectual Integrity, I think they are the faction you can popboom with most easily and cheapest, with the exception of the Peacekeepers.
Due to the Spartan +1 Police, four workers can be controlled by two police units only. Then you only need a rec commons, and you're already at size 7, the hab complex limit (presuming the seventh worker is made a specialist).
Other factions can only quell two drones by police, meaning they have to use more expensive methods to get to size 7, such as psych spending, holo theatres, research hospitals, crawling in nutrients...
For that reason, I can rightly claim that in this phase of the game, the Spartans are the best builder of all human factions. All we need to do is build some formers, creches, tree farms and then switch to democratic.
quote: Originally posted by Kassiopeia
But I agree with Snoddasmannen, I don't like this general shift in direction. While we both know you Googlie and Maniac are good strategists, are you really sure we have a shot at victory if we start to muck about like a headless chicken? "Builder, no, momentum, wait, builder, or maybe momentum, I know, hybrid!, okay, I guess builder". |
AFAIK our strategy has always been rather momentum. So if we changed now, it would be the first time. Besides, personally I'm not suggesting we change to builder for the rest of the game. Just a period long enough to get most of our bases up to size seven, and then we can evaluate. Imagine: some 20 bases, times seven population...
Personally I think it would be the beginning of the end if we continued on our current strategy no matter what, without taking into account the changed circumstances. Sure, we have been succesful in containing the Corporation: their economy has hardly grown these last fifteen years, allowing us to catch up. But we have not been so succesful that we could take on all of Planet already. Our economy needs to grow before we can build and support the military needed to do that. The Spartans are flexible faction. Let's make use of that and change to builder for a while!
(Besides, as Modo says, there are sufficient targets so that our existing military doesn't need to rust. )
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sentry33
|
 |
Warsaw, Poland
Jun 2004 time: 06:16
|
|
Heh, late post.. Modo and Maniac clarified it first
Last edited by sentry33 on 10-04-2005 at 20:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Snoddasmannen
So now we are preparing to go builder? I don't know, it sounds like the beginning of the end to me, but the Junta usually knows what it's doing 
|
here are some other comments from long ago:
quote: originally posted by Zeiter in the How shall we Play thread
I am also an advocate of making building a priority. However, I'm thinking of an unconventional approach. I've described this vision in other threads, so I'll just summarize it here:
Basically, we can use a momentum strategy in the short term to augment our building efforts in the long run. We are already drafting plans for a University invasion. By conquering and subjugating the University, we can increase our mineral production (as well as labs production if we get Zak submissive) much more than if we focused on a purely builder style. Of course, we won't stop there, but we'll continue on with Lal and, later on, Yang and the others. If we can just maintain tech parity, our new industrial centers on the Uni/Lal continent will lead us to triumph in any war, especially when combined with our superior morale.
I also advocate that we focus most of our efforts on building up energy credit and mineral production (especially mineral production). In fact, I think we should put the least amount of emphasis as possible on labs production, and instead rely on probing to maintain tech parity. Thus, I'm hoping to soon switch to police state, giving us loads of drone control and support, which will actually make us better builders. Yes, an unconventional approach, but the Spartans are almost perfectly suited for it.
We are very much focused on building, but just in a different way. |
and, from Kassiopeia:
quote: Posted by Kassiopeia in thesame thread
I think that we should emphasise momentum but try to keep it in balance with our builder efforts - I voted momentum but I'm fine with a hybrid approach too. A good solid base on the area we're sitting in right now to get those rover swarms up and running. Making a run for the centre should be priority - we are the ones best capable of robbing Yang clean of what he has. |
And from Maniac:
quote: Originally posted by maniac in the same thread
I think we should play as a builder and explorer/pod popper/tech stealer until we get Intellectual Integrity.
With that tech we can very easily get elite morale (Spartan inherent +1 morale, +2 from command center, +1 from high morale, and +1 from monolith), and then I think we should invade as many bases or factions as possible with eg some 4-1-1 elite (=> 2 MPs) troops.
Once Air Power and MMI arrives on the battlefield, our elite land units become much less powerful again, so we should exploit this window of opportunity as much as we can IMHO |
So it's not really an about-face to focus on a builder style for a few decades - it's really what we decided to do nine months ago
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:16
|
|
Here's what I've thought about :
- Declare a cessation of hostilities. A step between vendetta and truce, if you will. A phony war. It will allow us to test the waters and see if the Morganites and/or Gaians will bite.
- Suggest a white peace. The Morganites are the aggressors, but we have dealt quite a blow to them too. Restoring relations and simply ceasing hostilities without fiddling around with reparations etc. will speed up the process and probably work out the best for us in the end. It'll also make us look somewhat gracious.
Of course, we could make some demands to further test the waters, and then "downgrade" our desires out, so that it seems that we are giving away an arm and a leg for what we were planning all along. Old trick.
So the first step, IMO, is to send PMs to arginine and Chaos Theory, proposing a cessation of hostilities. "This would be the first step on the long journey to everlasting peace" or something. We should also consider issuing a public apology for the PTS raid. It's immaterial as far as gameplay goes, but it might rub the Morganites in the right direction. The loss of interfactional prestige won't be too big, I'd think, it might even make us look good. If we can time this to our switch to Democratic, to boot, we could try to throw in some RP line about reforming the government to a better shape.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:16
|
|
EDIT: Ignore the below - I fired up the original turn as a parallel-turn diplomacy exercise and tried to contact Yang - he won't talk
Posted by me in another thread, but maybe belonging here:
before we end the 2166 turn, how about selling Doc Air to Yang (if he'll talk to us)
Pros: - we'll get some credits
- we (may) get some goodwill from him
- He'll get a different tech in 2167 - one that we maybe can pilfer from him
- he'll get another tech and that may be the one that Morgan, Angels and Gaians pilfer from him, thus maintaining our Doc Air supremacy for a few more turns
- we can try to frame the Gaians - or Morgan - for the techsteal
Cons:- the tech he gets next year may turn out to be Doc init or Int Int - unlikely, IMO, as both are EXPLORE techs, as is Doc Air, and it isn't the Hive's priority (Conquer, Build are the Hive's)
- we give the others the possibility of pilfering that new tech from Yang as well as Doc Air from them subsequently or from the PK's in 4 years
- if we do, and steal his next tech, we risk vendetta again against the hive, if our framing is unsuccessful
All in all, I think the pros outweigh the cons. But before we get too deep into discussions, can someone other than Maniac or me test the turn to see if indeed Yang will talk to us .........................irrelevant - see edit at beginning of this post
Last edited by Googlie on 11-04-2005 at 08:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snoddasmannen
|
|
Sorry about just dropping in without properly reading through everything, but I'm in a hurry.
My question is, why do we want peace with the Morgans? Surely Morgan would be able to bloat far more without having to fear us. Are we that afraid of the other factions?
If we could make peace with Gaia, that would be nice, but I really don't want to give the Morgans any breathing room.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Modo44
|
 |
in western Poland
Jul 2004 time: 06:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Snoddasmannen
My question is, why do we want peace with the Morgans? Surely Morgan would be able to bloat far more without having to fear us. Are we that afraid of the other factions? |
Because, as much as I had hoped for this, we seem unable to invade in time (i.e. with full air superiority). Anything else would make the war too long, allowing the Angels and the Gaians to out-build us far too easy.
Instead, we want to make peace with Morgan soon, and pick the easier target, namely Yang. We can hurt the Hive badly even without making new units, so we could use the time to bring some infrastructure up for the long haul.
quote: Originally posted by Snoddasmannen
If we could make peace with Gaia, that would be nice, but I really don't want to give the Morgans any breathing room. |
Neither do I, but a protracked war, soon to become loss-intensive, would stall our development too much. A momentum strategy requires attacks to be quick and deadly. Remember what happened to Operation Barbarossa... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|