 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Once the United States invaded Vietnam, the North Vietnamese had every right to defend the people of Vietnam from imperialist aggression. If the U.S. hadn't invaded, the Viet Cong would have disposed of the puppet government by the end of the decade. In 1962, they were almost ready to declare a provisional government, but U.S. "advisors" were able to help keep the Southern dictatorship going a little longer. |
Ho used the same tactics that the commies used in Korea. He began the fight using guerillas. Later, if necessary, he would use conventional forces. This is what happened, but the US delayed the final conventional assault for more than a decade.
Now, as we all know, the reason for the 7 year window from Ho taking the North and the beginning of his aggression South was his need to install communism in the North and to build up his resources. There was a similar 6-7 year delay from Tet to the final offensive. Tet was such a devastating defeat that it took all that time to build up again.
What I will agree with is that the introduction of US forces into the South threatened success and forced Ho to use his conventional forces sooner than he had planned.
Now, most of this still does not answer the question as to why, in 1961, Ho had a right to wage aggressive war against the South for the purpose of conquest and annexation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
You guys may have had it worse, but that doesn't mean the first half the 80s weren't a lot scarier than the 70s in general. I didn't think we were going to live to see graduation. |
What were we going to go to war over? I don't think there was anything happening in the International arena that would have been likely to have triggered a nuclear war. There were numerous conflicts in minor nations, but by the 1980s it was pretty well established that neither state ws going to initiate a major conflict over a bush war going sour. Reagan's talk about MAD was nothing but a reriteration of a policy widely known for a long time. You were just too young to have heard it uttered in a different form by President Eisenhower.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|