 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
Car ownership in the US is not driven only be income, but by geography. Whilel i expect many poor residents of New Orleans lack cars, I would expect the proportion to be considerable lower in Biloxi or Gulfport, as those are small cities, where car ownership costs are relatively low, and transit is probably very limited.
When I first lived in Jacksonville, FL, i wondered why there were so many ads for discount auto parts chains, emphasizing that they were open 7 days a week. Till I realized that that was how poor folks managed to own autos - they bought cheap old ones, and fixed them themselves. Which meant the price of parts was a very large portion of their ownership costs. And having the auto parts store open 7 days a week, was their equivalent of having an auto repair shop open 7 days a week. If they needed a part on Sunday, and they couldnt buy it, and at a discount price, on Sunday, that meant they werent going anywhere till Monday.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Car ownership in the US is not driven only be income, but by geography. Whilel i expect many poor residents of New Orleans lack cars, I would expect the proportion to be considerable lower in Biloxi or Gulfport, as those are small cities, where car ownership costs are relatively low, and transit is probably very limited.
When I first lived in Jacksonville, FL, i wondered why there were so many ads for discount auto parts chains, emphasizing that they were open 7 days a week. Till I realized that that was how poor folks managed to own autos - they bought cheap old ones, and fixed them themselves. Which meant the price of parts was a very large portion of their ownership costs. And having the auto parts store open 7 days a week, was their equivalent of having an auto repair shop open 7 days a week. If they needed a part on Sunday, and they couldnt buy it, and at a discount price, on Sunday, that meant they werent going anywhere till Monday. |
exactly. most people own cars in my city. Even poor people. They often neglect other important things so they can ride in a car with a booming stereo (yes even poor people have these). But they live in slums.
The people who do not own cars are older mexican immigrants, druggies who choose drugs over tranportation, and people who are too stupid to figure out how to save $1000.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
techumseh
|
 |
of the frozen North.
Apr 1999 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Car ownership in the US is not driven only be income, but by geography. Whilel i expect many poor residents of New Orleans lack cars, I would expect the proportion to be considerable lower in Biloxi or Gulfport, as those are small cities, where car ownership costs are relatively low, and transit is probably very limited.
When I first lived in Jacksonville, FL, i wondered why there were so many ads for discount auto parts chains, emphasizing that they were open 7 days a week. Till I realized that that was how poor folks managed to own autos - they bought cheap old ones, and fixed them themselves. Which meant the price of parts was a very large portion of their ownership costs. And having the auto parts store open 7 days a week, was their equivalent of having an auto repair shop open 7 days a week. If they needed a part on Sunday, and they couldnt buy it, and at a discount price, on Sunday, that meant they werent going anywhere till Monday. |
Quibble all you want, the point is that the estimate of hundreds of thousands of people without cars in the affected area is reasonable.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi
Irony of the day: They can't get water to fight the fire. |
That makes no sense-- I can see flooded equipment failing but lack of water should never be an issue. The fire trucks I used ALWAYS had two forms of water intake-- one was for hydrants while another would give just as much supply of water in any place with a water depth of more than 2 and a half feet. Ponds, brooks, even an irrigation ditch could serve.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
I would assume the astrodome is the staging area - you have to let people off the bus somewhere - before alternate arrangements are made.
|
It's also got showers, plumbing and air conditioning, so if it takes them a number of days to figure things out, they're far better there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
That makes no sense-- I can see flooded equipment failing but lack of water should never be an issue. The fire trucks I used ALWAYS had two forms of water intake-- one was for hydrants while another would give just as much supply of water in any place with a water depth of more than 2 and a half feet. Ponds, brooks, even an irrigation ditch could serve. |
Is it possible that this is one of the types of fire that can't be put out by water? Or maybe that the "toxic water" is less suitable than normal water?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dis
I'm not familiar with civilian firefighting equipment. But in the navy you can actually take take suction from flooded compartments (on a ship) with various equipment (educters and pumps etc). |
Well our volunteer brigade could get source water from ANY standing water source with sufficient depth-- and that was 1970s and 1980s equipment (Fire trucks can last a LOOONG time-- we had a 1950s model that worked any bigger fire))
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Edan
Is it possible that this is one of the types of fire that can't be put out by water? |
Possible-- but they should have some alternate equipment for those types of fires regardless of the flooding (although perhaps mobilizing it is the problem)
quote: Originally posted by Edan
Or maybe that the "toxic water" is less suitable than normal water? |
Perhaps-- although the only real problems would be if the water contained concentrations of of flammable materials or something toxic when burned. But the quatities of water are huge so I don't see a big problem ( but am no expert )-- I'm thinking that even a gasoline sheen on the water would not hurt your ability to use it for firefighting if your intakes are 4-5 feet below the surface
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|