 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
Some icky facts:
Nielsen Canada April 6, 2002 National Ratings Top 10
1. H.N.I.C.
2. H.N.I.C.
3. CTV National News
4. CTV Evening News
5. CTV Late News
6. Mysterious Ways
7. Curling
8. Cold Squad
9. Curling
10. Hockey Pre-Game
Hmm, I don't see the CBC newscast in there anywhere. In fact, it was beat out by "Cold Squad", which tells you something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
There are too many examples of the media in general picking up the wrong end of the stick on a story and completely misleading the public in this country. |
*Austin Powers voice*
C'mon, man, throw us a bone here.
*Dr. Evil voice*
I mean, would it kill you to give us one frickin' example. Hmmm? Hmmm?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Even Global and CTV are all mostly liberal, as is most of the country, that's why they're #1. |
Where is the conspiracy in the majority being ... the majority?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
Sorry, Asher. NYE was the conspiracy theorist, not you.
As for an anti-Alberta bias in the media, you're just watching the wrong newscasts. During the NDP reign of terror in BC (of which I am a refugee) I got sick of watching the litany of pro-Alberta media stories on the news and in the papers. In Alberta "the taxes are lower, unemployment is lower, government understands business, higher wages, etc. etc. et-frickin-cetera".
I've got nothing against Alberta, and BC was really in a horrible mess, but you get sick of having your nose rubbed in it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
That wasn't blatant bias based on lies. It was the truth. |
Ever thought that those exact words could be said by an Ontarian Liberal about the CBC?
The media doesn't lie. It slants things. And the media had a field day in BC knocking the NDP by holding up all the positives about Alberta without showing counterbalancing negatives. But an Albertan NDPer would have been infuriated by those newscasts, because they didn't show the whole picture.
You just characterize it as the truth because it highlights the story you want to tell.
--------------------
Mouse trap? Sorry to burst a bubble, but Albertans didn't invent oil.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Is it going to surprise you to find out that oil isn't the largest industry in Alberta? |
Hey, if you don't want it, we'll take it.
quote: You have a point though about the BC media bit. I did not witness any of it. No doubt BC has and had a lot of things going for it. So it might get tiresome to constantly be told the grass is greener in that other pasture. Even if it is under 3 feet of snow. |
Exactly. Nobody likes hearing their home get bashed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
So by your logic we should only have one party then, and then we can always vote for that one party and they'll do what we want. Simply brilliant.
|
No, I said you vote for the party that is most likely to win power. In the post-Mulroney era, that means the Liberals because the right-wingers are divided. There is no way that the PCs or CAs are going to gain power until they reunite. They simply split the conservative vote so there is no point in voting for them.
Why do you think King Jean is still in power. He's not there because we all love him. He's there because there is no alternative. Most of the country realizes this accept for Alberta.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Errm...in most democracies, the idea is you vote for the party that you feel represents your views. You don't vote for the party who is already winning consistent majority governments and hope they take heart and care about what you want, even if they can afford to lose your votes. 
|
If you're smart, you vote for the party that is most likely to do the most for you, or you make a protest vote.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
The Senate is a joke, it's completely and utterly useless, and it is unfair how minority provinces can simply be ignored by the government because they're minorities.
|
Yes, the Senate is useless. Get rid of it.
Smaller provinces are not ignored. NFLD has (or had) a strong voice in the Liberal gov't because of Tobin. The same thing could be achieved by Alta if they elected a strong Liberal MP.
Alta had a strong voice in the Mulroney gov't with Andre Masse (I'm not sure if that is the right name, but it was one of M's Lieutenants from Calgary)
quote: Originally posted by Asher
This way, the always-dominant Ontario/Quebec don't have complete control over the entire country by themselves, as they seemingly always do in the Executive branch and the House of Commons.
|
Ontario and Quebec should have a strong voice because they represent more than 50 per cent of Canadians (or close to that number). Why should 100,000 PEIers have more power than the millions of Ontarians and Quebecers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tingkai
No, I said you vote for the party that is most likely to win power. In the post-Mulroney era, that means the Liberals because the right-wingers are divided. There is no way that the PCs or CAs are going to gain power until they reunite. They simply split the conservative vote so there is no point in voting for them.
Why do you think King Jean is still in power. He's not there because we all love him. He's there because there is no alternative. Most of the country realizes this accept for Alberta.
If you're smart, you vote for the party that is most likely to do the most for you, or you make a protest vote. |
Sorry, this makes absolutely no sense to me.
No matter who we vote for, Alberta's vote is expendable. It won't make or break elections.
So how does voting for liberals help us at all? They'll still get into power by an even more overwhelming majority, and they can still continue to ignore the province because they still don't need our votes to stay in power. Actually, they need to worry less about competition, since they have an even larger majority now.
I have huge problems following your logic on that.
You seem to be saying that by electing liberals to the federal government, they will meet our conservative needs better. Am I getting that right?
quote: Smaller provinces are not ignored. NFLD has (or had) a strong voice in the Liberal gov't because of Tobin. The same thing could be achieved by Alta if they elected a strong Liberal MP.
Alta had a strong voice in the Mulroney gov't with Andre Masse (I'm not sure if that is the right name, but it was one of M's Lieutenants from Calgary) |
I don't think you know that Mulroney and his government wasn't well liked where I come from. He's on the same level as Chretien, despite what his party said on paper. He's the reason why the right split up...
But that's not the point. SOMETIMES Alberta may get a real voice in government. Great. But why it it SOMETIMES? Ever since Chretien got in power he's displayed a remarkable dislike for the entire province, refuses to campaign here, and meddles with provincial politics without a real clue what's going on. He's just causing trouble.
If he's going to ignore Alberta politically, then stay the hell out of our provincial politics. He can't muck around both ways.
quote: Ontario and Quebec should have a strong voice because they represent more than 50 per cent of Canadians (or close to that number). Why should 100,000 PEIers have more power than the millions of Ontarians and Quebecers. |
Why should PEIers have the same amount of power as Ontarians and Quebecers?
Aren't you all for equality?
You think it's unfair for rich people to have their votes count more. Now we're applying it to provinces: Are provinces with huge populations always going to dominate the smaller ones?
In 1 of the branches of government, the Senate, every province should be represented equally. This protects against abuses from the majority (almost always Quebec/Ontario), while it doesn't give "more" power than Ontario/Quebec has to the smaller people. The Senate cannot MAKE the laws, they would simply demand changes in cases where the greed of Ontario/Quebec would severely harm a minority province(s) (take the NEP as the prime example here).
It works perfectly fine in the states, far better than our current system is working, although you guys might not think so since everything is just peachy when you're in the majority and get to push the smaller guys around.
Last edited by Asher on 09-04-2002 at 09:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|