 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
"No matter how long they teach their kids ukraininan, they speak/act/are russian."
My reference books put the ratio as ~73% Ukrainian, ~22% Russian. That would seem to be at odds with your assertion. Further, the percentage of Ukrainians is higher in the countryside versus the city, which could skew your perceptions.
Last edited by DanS on 12-06-2002 at 09:55
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
morb
|
 |
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Nov 2001 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
"their ties with Russia are very strong."
I don't doubt that, Dal. But the formation of a "Greater Russia" is unlikely, considering that an overwhelming majority of Ukrainians identify themselves as having Ukrainian ethnicity, not Russian.
Further, I don't doubt that Morb talks with few people who identify themselves as Ukrainian, considering that there is a much higher percentage of Ukrainians in the countryside. However, I'm suggesting that his experience is skewed.
If he could tell us how much time he spent in the countryside v. Kiev, that would be helpful. |
first of all, there are just as many of these "75% ukraininans" in RUSSIA with names like Dobrenko or kravchuk who've been russian for so long all they have left that's Ukrainina is their last name. Can you imagine? The two "countries" have been one unified country long before the annexation of others and before the SU was even a possibility. 350(?) years of mutual coexistance. but more than that, we have been ONE country ONE people for so long, its even rediculous to call us any different. You can't tell us apart.
as far as "people from country side," I have many freinds here from the former republics, one girl is from a town near dnepropetrovsk. her last name also ends in an "o" but she doesn't tell you she's ukrainian, because she doesn't even speak the language. she's russian more than even I since I also have a jewish dose in me. one of my better friends is from "the ukrainian country side." his story is similar to this girl's.
the only "ukrainins" who speak of independence are those who are drunk on power or those in the far west of ukraine who are typically polish ukrainians from the terretories taken back from poland. hey, if they want to move to poland, i won't mind. poland can have them. the rest are russian.
also, it's a bit insulting for you to say that you might know more than me about these things because you've looked up CIA world factbook, i've looked at those numbers too. the difference is i have the real world culture and have experiance that you lack.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:19
|
|
Isn't Israel basically the Middle East's Texas?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
Here is a particularly interesting part of the report as it relates to this discussion...
"Nostalgia for the former Soviet Union is stronger among Russians than Ukrainians, and predictably, few Russians identify with Ukraine. In the survey, 51 percent of Russians agreed that "it is a great misfortune that the Soviet Union no longer exists," and another 19 percent agreed more than disagreed. The figures for Ukrainians are 35 percent and 17 percent, respectively. Nostalgia for the Soviet Union appears to be a yearning for a time when at least minimal human needs were met, rather than a strong ideological commitment. The question whether Ukraine and Russia should unite drew a similar response. Twenty four percent of Ukrainians thought the country should reunite with Russia, with an additional 19 percent expressing partial support. Russian percentages were 50 and 33 percents, respectively.
"Opinion differs by region, but differences by ethnicity are not available because the data are not tabulated by both region and nationality. Nevertheless, the desire for unification of some sort appears marginal among Ukrainians in the west, but substantial in the east. Ukrainians comprise almost 90 percent of the population in the seven oblasts that joined the Soviet Union after the war.(12) Only 11 percent in these oblasts favored outright unification, with an additional 16 percent being lukewarm to the idea. In the east, where Ukrainians account for 54 percent and Russians for 41 percent, 46 percent of the respondents favored unification and 33 percent favored it advisedly.(13) "
Last edited by DanS on 13-06-2002 at 04:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
morb
|
 |
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Nov 2001 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Here is a particularly interesting part of the report as it relates to this discussion...
Nevertheless, the desire for unification of some sort appears marginal among Ukrainians in the west, but substantial in the east. |
yes, and incidently, the farther east you go, the more population density increases. also, I've already mentioned that here several times without the use of any stinkin surveys.
quote: Ukrainians comprise almost 90 percent of the population in the seven oblasts that joined the Soviet Union after the war.(12) Only 11 percent in these oblasts favored outright unification, with an additional 16 percent being lukewarm to the idea. In the east, where Ukrainians account for 54 percent and Russians for 41 percent, 46 percent of the respondents favored unification and 33 percent favored it advisedly.(13) "[/i] |
first of all Ukrain was never really "appart" at that point to be "reunited" in the first place. there were strong seperatist and isolationist movements in both Ukrain AND Russia at that time. as history would prove the "reds" were simply much more strong and numerous of all other factions for better or worse. basically, this "evidence" doesn't say or prove anything here.
I'l point out again, that the people have coexisted as one for much longer than this country has even existed, including all the colonial years.
Also I am not nastalgiac over the SU. I left it to escape communism. but it doesn't automatically mean that i wouldn't like to see the people reunified.
think of it this way, what we are talking about is closer to the situation between east and west german. the only difference is that Russia is at this point only marginally better off today than Ukrain, but its potential is much greater for the future. that's why I say that in 10 years when russia begins to get back up on its feet and Ukrain is still where they are today, they'll begin to draw closer. Belarus' is areguably the most distant of the 3 language/culture wise. But they are economically much weaker than either Russia or Ukraine. They've held out for ~10 years being independent, and they're kinda getting tired of it. give Ukraine another 10 and they'll be in a similar situation... mmkay?
Last edited by morb on 13-06-2002 at 09:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
"the only difference is that Russia is at this point only marginally better off today than Ukrain, but its potential is much greater for the future."
How do you figure this potential?
"give Ukraine another 10 and they'll be in a similar situation..."
Why the fatalism? On what do you base your pessimism?
I take it that your argument is based on the assumption that the west will somehow be swayed by the economic success of Russia? You would have to convince most people in the west that forming a confederacy is the right thing to do for it to fly, correct?
" No matter how long those republics cry about their ‘independence’, they depend of Russia and always will. Georgian people should elect other president. The policy of their current president is the policy of sick man. Their so-called economy based on Russia, they can’t survive without us. The confrontation with Russia is the dead end for Georgia."
Serb: Shevardnadze has always been very well-respected here in Washington.
Last edited by DanS on 13-06-2002 at 11:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
morb
|
 |
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Nov 2001 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Vagabond
Personally I am very pessimistic in what concerns perspectives of the hypothetic Russian-Ukrainian reunification in a single state. Sorry, Morb. Certainly, the separation was unnatural and unfortunate. But once that happened, it is practically irreversible. Even assuming for the sake of argument that the majority of the Ukrainian citizens want to reunificate with Russia, there will always remain a significant portion of the population which is against and whose opinion cannot be ignored. Otherwise, instead of mutual benefits we'll only get an additional pain in the ass. In the modern world, unless something unpredictable happens, there seems to be no incentive for that part of the population to change its mind. I don't buy the economic argument, because if Russia goes up economically she will anyway drag Ukraine up.
Perhaps the best for all of us would be to accept the inevitable and to stop unnerving each other with empty talks about reunification. Instead we better concentrate on building a healthy relationship a la EU.
But I would be glad to be wrong on this issue. |
what i originally meant was pretty much what yo have in your middle paragraph. I doubt myself that the sovereignty of Ukraine is a temporary thing. its likely to stay. but what I do pretdict, is that at least the 3, Belarus', Ukraine, Russia will form a strong economic union. it will happen because Russia is likely to make it out of the rut of all 3 and the other too will simply want a piece of the action. Russia of course will be all too eager to setup legit relations because, 1) both Belarus' and Ukraine are already making money off Russia by selling raw materials that do not belong to them but run through their territories and 2) Russia will have some contiguity with western europe for further economic developement. Its already happening. Ukraine, Russia and Germany (France and Italy soon to follow) have already setup a natural GAS consortium in which Russia will supply the resources, Ukraine will control its flow and collect terrifs for the use of its gas lines (and further development of new lines is already on the plan boards) and the west will play the role of the consumer. Further, Ukraine is likely going to be a key player in any kind of goods transportation duties between russia and the west. Ukraine being physically between Russia and the west is something neither the west nore Russia can get around. It is inevitable that Ukraine will draw closer to Russia for its own benifite. The west doesn't need Ukraine, but Russia does.
So even if Ukraine and Russia and Belarus' won't nessesarily be a single unified soveriegn conutry, they will likely become what Canada and US are to each other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|