 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MosesPresley
JWB was a "rapist". He did deserve what he got, if you think street justice, poetic justice or whatever you want to call it is the way one should conduct themselves in a civilized society. I disagree with that part. My problem is with the double standard. Forced sexual mutilation is abhorrent and is not a laughing matter. Maybe Monty Python in their heyday or somebody else might be able to spin comic gold from this, but that is besides the point. If a man was to make jokes in mixed company about how some soldiers, pick any war, or a serial killer (often they are victims of sexual abuse) sexually mutilated women, he would be villified and ostracized and rightly so. Excusing the women for this callousness plays into the hands of the feminazis. That is the point I was making. |
JWB's own behavior made him a legitimate target for the humor. He was a scumbag who got his comeuppance. I'm sure it was traumatizing to have his penis severed, but he should have thought of that before he went and raped Lorena. Now maybe he knows how traumatized she felt.
Considering he got his penis back and has made a career off it, I'd say any comedy about it is perfectly fine and justified. He deserved worse, frankly.
Now if a woman went and mutilated a man unprovoked or hadn't done something as heinous as rape, I'd agree it isn't a laughing matter. But the Bobbitt scenario is a bad example, because the bastard got what he had coming to him. So I'll laugh my ass off at him.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
JWB's own behavior made him a legitimate target for the humor. He was a scumbag who got his comeuppance. I'm sure it was traumatizing to have his penis severed, but he should have thought of that before he went and raped Lorena. Now maybe he knows how traumatized she felt.
Considering he got his penis back and has made a career off it, I'd say any comedy about it is perfectly fine and justified. He deserved worse, frankly.
Now if a woman went and mutilated a man unprovoked or hadn't done something as heinous as rape, I'd agree it isn't a laughing matter. But the Bobbitt scenario is a bad example, because the bastard got what he had coming to him. So I'll laugh my ass off at him. |
Well according to your scenario, if a woman sexually abuses me, then I have the right to cut her breasts off, as long as they are sewn back on and she can make some money off of the deal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
No, certainly doesn't always mean no. That is just a simple platitude for simpletons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Boris
OK. Point made.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
YES, NO MEANS NO!
Once a woman says no, you stop. You go any futher and you are scum, IMO. |
BS, you must not get much. It depends on how it is being said. My wife says no and she means yes and sometimes she says no and she means NO.
edited: wrong quote
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MosesPresley
No sometimes means yes. Words are ambiguous at best. Ask any lawyer. |
Ask any Lawyer what?, What his fee is for defending
you?
No does mean no, otherwise it's a rape or a mercy
screw. Eithier way is really pathic.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|