 |
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Cort> RP have sent us Toledo, Barca and New Madrid
Theseus> 
Cort> they could be gone next turn if we reach agreement
Theseus> Pregnant pause.
MasterZen> ok
MasterZen> here's the deal
MasterZen> as you can imagine this proposal is pretty much the only thing we've been debating for the last couple of days (weeks)
Cort> indeed
Theseus> Us to.
Theseus> too
MasterZen> however, before we accept there are two things that bother us, and might impede an arrangement to be made
Theseus> RP and RP?
MasterZen> ok, THREE things 
Theseus> LOL
MasterZen> but RP was already assumed as a given, so back to the other two
MasterZen> to be honest, our guys are not happy at the fact that we're getting half of bob, and GS is getting not only the other half but its already massively-developed territory (minus the pretty useless North Estonaia ghetto projects)
Cort> less than half - Lion's share for you guys
MasterZen> and the second point is Lego. Lego is not the isolationist turtle it was 50 turns ago. I think this point in history they will try and win by all means, and if that inolves being actively involved in the bobian question, they will
Cort> You'd have just about all of ND
Theseus> Can we deal with the second point first? Lego?
Cort> Fair point, MZ - will ND call in the MPP?
Theseus> I am not sure what you mean about Lego, MZ.
MasterZen> so as long as Lego's position remains an unknown, we can't really accept. If we go to war with ND it will be with all we've got, that will leave our territory really undefended
MasterZen> Lego might very well not tolerate our gangbaning of ND
Aggie> they are capable of intervening and creating a dissaterous war for both of us
Cort> What if Legonian neutrality could be assured?
MasterZen> and especially for us :P
MasterZen> yeah, like GS's neutrality for this war?
Aggie> i have good through the war in my mind. Lego could guarentee stalemate or worse.
Aggie> i mean gone
MasterZen> its the same thing that happened with GS. We did everything to prevent GS from intervening and wrongly thought we had achieved that. And it all went to hell
Theseus> Ahhh, the Lego "balance" issue. FYI, I outright asked vondrack if we could hire you... he said it would be fine. Also, we are trying to arrange a chat with Nimitz.
MasterZen> same exact thing can happen with Lego if ND does an RP-style deal with them, think about that
MasterZen> if I've learned anything from this game is that even the things you think are assured, aren't
Theseus> I do not believe that we can jointly enter into this contract without Lego's explicit agreement.
Theseus> Not can't... shouldn't.
Theseus> In fact, I have made overtures to Lego to join in the action.
Theseus> Move 'balance' from 4 primary players to 3.
Cort> We are prepared to share our portion of Bob with Lego if they do
Theseus> BTW, this is going to come back around to your first issue... we are committed to a 3 team 'balance' as well, and then we'll see where the game takes us.
Cort> did you like the Rider Upgrade Scheme?
Aggie> that was very helpful
Cort> So, assuming we can satisfy you with a fair share of Bob,
Theseus> Anyway, we presented a pretty comprehensive draft contract. Let's get down to the nitty gritty.
Aggie> Theseus and cort haus, as i said in our forum, the amount of time and detail you put into this, was amazing
Theseus> CH, really. :applause:
Cort> shows we're serious, right?
Aggie> yes indeed. Even people who might disagree, can't help but take a second look
Cort> So we're keen to get round the Lego problem
Theseus> Q: Who have you dealt with most and best at Lego? Vondrack? Nimitz?
Aggie> Well thats the most difficult one. If I'm lego I'd support ND and involve us the rest of the world in a war forever. aslo they get a GA out of it
Aggie> vondrack
Theseus> Lego: If it's OK, I'd like us to try to gain their concurrence.
Aggie> go for it
Aggie> but part of me suspects that the deal might still fall through from our end.
Aggie> there isa significant element that wants no GS on BOB
Aggie> this is just from a game winning situation for us point of view(nothing persoanl)
Theseus> Ah, Aggie, I was just typing a more complete thought... wait a sec.
Theseus> Further: You guys want more land. I assume that regards the current ND city at the SW edge of the jungle... how about we offer that to Lego, given a commitment to share the luxes (for now)?
Aggie> let me see a map
Aggie> brb
Theseus> Re no GS on Bob: You can't take out ND without us, and we don;t have a shot without more land. While we in fact will be the contracting party, you benefit greatly as well.
Theseus> Let me say that another way: You are paying US to give you a shot, in the form of land.
Theseus> And resources, too, but we have addressed that in our draft contract.
Aggie> i see that, but there are other ways we can win. In the end we(GOW) must look at all possibilites and see which ones have the best outcome for us
Theseus> Fair enough.
Theseus> Hmmm... Lego contracts GoW to take over Bob. Possible.
Aggie> to be honest I must be careful, becasue to a degree I ahve been playing the game with my own plans and strategies. I am aware of the charge that I do what I and not what the team wants
Theseus> We've actually heard that not about you but about vondrack.
Aggie> it was like a scenario to me when you come into a situation and then try to find the best way to win with what you have
Aggie> i suspect yes
Aggie> most talks were between me and him
Theseus> I've had the sense that although your debates have been raucous, GoW has been fairly unified.
Theseus> brb
Aggie> yes they are, but this is one of those, "2 distinct sides arguements"
Cort> So if you see your options best invested elsewhere, do you have any suggestions as to how we might otherwise end our war?
Aggie> well imho a deal of trade could do it, we guarentee resources and colonies in exchange for peace.
Aggie> lets face it, any cities you have on bob are hopelessly corrupt. Unless you palace jump to pamploma and buidl FP in your core. But then n estonia is hopelessly corrupt. So this is about resoiurces and lux in the end
Cort> and ND?
Theseus> We are prepared to Palace Jump.
Theseus> To us, the end-game is about production, not just resources.
Theseus> Also, nice job pinging our Knights. 
Cort> good shooting
Aggie> we were lucky
Theseus> I gotta jump... let me summarize:
Theseus> * GoW is still undetermined as to their team choice of direction.
Aggie> yes we are
Aggie> saadly i still say a 50/50 chance of wither way
Aggie> either
Theseus> * Who gets what land (assuming that we can cut such a deal) is in question.
Aggie> yes,could you give us pamploma mountains north
Theseus> * We concur that Lego's cooperation is critical.
Theseus> Aggie, say that again... more clarity.
Aggie> is it possible you could expand our area from the mountains south of pamploma northward
Aggie> say Alamo remains ours
Aggie> and pamploma
Aggie> you get the coastal cities to Barcelona and the rest is a Neutral zone maybe
Theseus> WHOA... that is a lotta land. Gotta go, will leace this open if that's OK, and will respond later. But thanks for the counter-response!
Theseus> leave
Aggie> bye
Cort> ok guys, thanks for the chat
Ennet> be good!
Aggie> yes thank you
Cort> * exits stage left
Session Close: Sun Nov 23 02:01:35 2003
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Hi Aggie,
Just a quite to note to say hello, and to check that your team has recieved our analysis of land and tile-counts in the world which I sent yesterday.
We appreciate that you need time to discuss this matter amongst yourselves, but we were wondering if you could give any indication of the likelihood or otherwise of GoW accepting the principle of a 2:1 split of Bob, with GoW enjoying the 66%.
Also, have you met with Vondrack? He assured us that in the event of GoW and GS coming to an agreement, Lego would would not intervene against us. Obviously, you need to hear that from him personally, so we were wondering if progress had been made in that avenue.
Finally, regarding your expressed aspirations for the Alamo-Pamplona region - would this be a strategic location you would wish to control for the purposes of conducting operations against ND, or a permanent feature of the GoW empire?
Many thanks, and warm regards,
Cort Haus
Gathering Storm
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Yes we have recieved the analysis and I am impressed with them. A more formal response in the making, but I feel that before you play your turn I must inform you that it appears that this proposal will not be approved and other options are winning out. So here's my advice, play the turn as if a peace deal will not be made. We appreciate the great work and IMHO this is a fair and practical deal. However, the majority of the team feels that other options are best for our team. We do hope that the channel of communication stay open and that hopefully at a later date peace can be made.
Best of Luck
Aggie
|
Last edited by Cort Haus on 27-11-2003 at 22:29
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Aggie,
Thanks for the reply.
A view is developing at GS that the key obstacle to peace on Bob lies in the following conundrum:
1. GS are keen to hang on to what they and their allies hold in Spain because of (a) land shortage (b) possible essential strategic resource access - but we don't know for sure yet and (c) shield investment made.
2. GoW are keen to drive GS & their allies from Spain - perhaps for the same reasons as GS wish to hold it, but with the key additional reason that Spain, or part of it, was to be ND's award to GoW under a contract to drive RP from the continent.
The longer that shields continue to be spent forcing an outcome, the more Lego benefits, and the further behind the protagonists on Bob - particularly the sqeezed nations of GoW and GS - will fall.
We could have more Forest of Doom battles before a military settlement is finally reached, but we think a better option for all 3 of us is for GoW, ND and GS to sit down together as soon as possible and determine a final settlement to the great and terrible Bobian war. Understanding as we do now that some on the GoW side have more affection and respect for RP than GS, maybe the Spanish should have a seat at the table too.
Regards,
CH
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Hi Aggie,
Thank-you for your peace offer. GS and RP are considering our team positions with regard to the future, but meanwhile there is an idea I'd like you and your team to consider.
The recent carnage on Bob has seen the participants kiss goodbye to a staggering number of shields, as Lego's explosion on the powergraph dramatically illustrates.
GS concluded that as long as its troops remained on Bob, the alliance against us would ensure that Lego win the game. Wheras a few turns ago we felt that ND was the primary obstacle to the interests of both GoW and GS, the recent combined shield losses have put Lego in a dominant position, and a lengthy, expensive conclusion to the status of Pamplona could be just what Lego need to become unnassailable.
I want to suggest to all teams in the Great Bobian War that a final settlement could now be reached which offered immediate peace, security, mutual benefit and common interest.
I stress again that this is not currently a GS team position - it is an idea that all four sides at war on Bob can consider simultaneously.
The sticking point in such a game-saving deal of course, is the fact that many on the GoW side wish to eliminate GS and RP from the game. This is music to vondracks ears, I'm sure - and the implications of such sentiments as GoW policy are all too obvious.
Regards,
Cort Haus.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Thankyou for your message, MZ. It has been posted on our forum for discussion, but meanwhile here are couple of thoughts.
1) GS are at peace with GoW, but not yet with ND - from whom we have not recieved a reply to recent suggestions of peace. While we are still at war with ND, they could take the cities.
Further, whilst there is a theoretical possibility of a deal being done with these cities, we would naturally have to discuss the situation with the original owners of those cities, who, as you will understand, are slightly sore at the moment.
2) A post-war chat sounds an excellent idea. I'm sure GS will look forward to it 
Best Regards,
Cort Haus
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Cort Haus
|
 |
London
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Hi MZ,
We have the turn, and in anticipation of possible GS-GoW co-operation and friendship, can continue to hold Barcelona and New Madrid for the time being. Whilst they are being held but not defended, there is the possibility of ND taking these cities - so if you guys are saying "don't disband them yet" we have to assume that you're not asking us to hold them for your allies to take, perhaps on your behalf.
We have gunpowder and can finally see the Saltpeter. Interestingly, we were holding some near Barc (and had settlers there recently), which helps us to understand the value GoW would place on Barcelona.
Would you be interested in trading tech for Barcelona and New Madrid? We should say that New Madrid has been a buggy city on some players PC's, but not fatally on mine. All the citizens are Chinese, not Spanish. The row of heads of the chinese citizens are invisible on the city screen on my PC, but apart from that the city functions as normal.
If you were interested, we don't know what technology you may have to offer - other than chemistry in a few turn's time. We will probably research astronomy in the meantime (won't take us long) - unless we had news that might sugegst alternative paths.
Regards,
Cort.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|