 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
We've already closed the Map Making deal with GoW, at least assuming they accepted our offer. (Edit: In-game, that is.)
Last edited by nbarclay on 11-03-2003 at 09:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
Points we need to cover with Lego (if I'm not missing something):
1) We are already started researching Republic, so it would likely make more sense for us to research it than for them to.
2) Unless they have commitments from GoW and RP not to sell or trade Republic farther, an arrangement where Lego agrees not to sell it to ND or Vox themselves does not ensure us the opportunity of having half the trading rights. Expecting us to pay half the financial cost without our being guaranteed half the trading rights (or otherwise getting about half the benefits) seems less than entirely reasonable.
Last edited by nbarclay on 11-03-2003 at 10:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Nathan, there is no real way of knowing how far lego is on republic, which erxplains my question of an eta. So far, I avoided telling them we are already on route with republic, but if you all think that this is not grave to spill to them, I ill have more arguments to reason with them.
as to your #2: of course half the financial cost would be nonsense, even more so as they define it as half the gold we would get during the turns it would take them to research. If we gain more commerce during this period, we could actually pay over half the beaker cost. I've got tons of arguments lined up with them to explain this, but first of all I need replies on CoL: if we're going to sell it to them, I wouldn't mind if they are going to pay us half the beaker cost for it, or even one third would be superb. In reality, 100 gold would probably be too much to ask.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aeson
|
 |
orangesoda
Nov 2001 time: 22:26
|
|
Well at least that's cleared up. Blocking techs is a good point, but that means they morgaged their future (getting to MM) on luck from huts. They would have had to be very smart to save their huts, and make a huge mistake hoping for long odds to pay off.
Of course if they had 10 huts, it's not that long of odds, but still nowhere near the sure thing that beelining for MM is.
---------------
I think it all works out well for us. We stand to make more from CoL than we could have otherwise.
I also don't mind slowing down the tech rate, as long as the 'duplication' is between us (GS, Vox, and Lego) and BOB. Once Riders and Ansars are roaming on BOB, bad things can happen. I think we should recommend that Lego research Construction or Currency, and we will be willing to trade The Republic for their tech + 1/2 the beaker difference in gold (if no trading restrictions), or hopefully work out some sort of revenue sharing treaty where we split the proceeds from those two techs and don't compete with ourselves when trading them. In such a case, 1/4 the beaker difference in gold.
How we include Vox in all this is the hard part.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Just received a new proposal on republic from lego, basically, they sell rep to GoW, we can sell it to Vox, and as a compensation they asked for 70 gold to compensate the difference.
I tried to friendly explain to them that given the new situation, maybe it wuld be a good idea for them to drop the gold, as perhaps we would be the ones needing to ask for money. If anyone feels inclined to accurately calculate it, be my guest 
(should be BeforeLast(Curr) + BeforeLast(Constr) + Last(Curr) + Last(Constr) compared to Second(rep) + Third(rep) Not sure who is in the advantage here, it's definately close)
Further:
- are there people who want to join Sunday's chat, 9 pm GMT?
- And, what are our future research plans going to be, and what would we want to let the legos search for?
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Shiber: Sorry, sooner then 9pm GMT is not possible for me, it really is the earliest I can make it. Normally, I wouldn't mind at all if you would start before me, but not in this case, the relation to lego is still very unripe and fragile, I would really like it if I can keep the GS-voice-to-Lego role for a bit longer. Later on open chat should not be a problem, but now, we should look out for them getting a messy idea of us, I strongly suggest I moderate our side of the chat to Lego.
Beeline for cavalry... dunno... it sounds ok, as Bob will have 3-move UUs, so maybe their emphasis won't be on the Southern route. But if we want to really pull it off, we should either have an insane amount of cash by then to rushbuy knights / WCs before cavs, or we need to get Lego in to the fight. I hope I'm wrong, but somehow, I don't see us dominating enough to pul off a cav rush, Bob has 3 teams which could get them to riflemen rather quickly.
Not trading techs with Bob: another thing to consider, but (at least at first) not really viable. The moment we shut them out of our tech dealing, they are going to unite against us, which means we'll have a hard time, while Lego can sail right along... not our best option. Maybe we can do it later on, after education has been distributed (so a possible GL does not become an issue), and / or after our GA has given us double the territory we could get peacefully.
Short term, I think we should try to convince Lego to get us to knights asap. And I'm positive that if this gets mentioned in chat, I can squeeze in a question whether they were planning this, and have a pyramid prebuild for Sun Tzu, or simply have a pyramid build.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
I'll try and make it to the chat- what's another hour of sleep prior to a 10-hours day of non-stop university studies, compared to pressing FA business? 
We should point out that we would like to keep as less gold as possible from our deals- and make it a pure tech trading scheme. Any differences can be balanced by future trades, so there's no point in GS giving Lego money, than vice versa, and so forth, for every "in-game" trade we make.
After things have settled with Lego, wtr to the tech trade program, i think it would be appropriate to raise the issue of combined anti-Bob military alliance. The Bobians will surely get stronger, as they have ample room and plenty of Iron (especially RP). Although Lego might have enough territory- keeping the other super powers (like RP) in check could be in their interest as well. A Lego expeditionary (diversion) force striking on RP's east coast, and ours on the western could put an end to the main competitor. ND and GoW have both left RP alone, also because of the large jungle that seperates them- i'm sure they can be convinced of leaving themselves out of it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
good idea, Shiber, I'll try to fit it in. I would like to avoid answering questions on our wonders, that's why I want to squeeze the question in somewhere (like I did when asking lego for their research power), not making it a big point, but simply one of the smaller things that get chatted about. The Legos are easy, in that they follow a chat instead of leading one (at least they have done so far), which makes it possible, with a bit of preparation, to set the topics we want to discuss and avoid those we don't want mentioned.
Aeson: indeed, if RP goes for rep, it's quite likely they will finish a few turns after us, even the next turn if we have to give it to a few nations immediately. Chatting with them might be a good idea, and splitting the difference would certainly work. Who's RP's ambassador?
One problem on the NDAs though (I saw it while writing the PM): we didn't ask before that lego enforced an NDA on rep, and it makes sense for both of us to demand it, with one catch: if republic comes with a NDA, it's highly likely that either curr of constr will come with one too. We cannot risk that, we need to get these techs in time, not 10 turns after we get republic.
Keep the comments coming, guys, a lot of useful stuff in here
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:26
|
|
Lego have told us by the diplomatic channels that they got Construction from a hut, so if we ask them again where they got it from, it would appear like we think they're lying; mistrust is not the message we are trying to convey here, so I would advise against it.
I've rethought the whole 80 gold thing, and I've come to the conclusion that we should refuse to their offer at the moment. Sunday's chat would make an excellent opportunity to explain to Lego that, as Zeit said, we are seeking a partner and we can balance this deal in future exchanges, and furthermore, that we're nobody's fools, and they can't simply pull a fast one on us like that, allowing themselves to set a high price for the tech just because they've just discovered the tech and there's no time left for discussions.
Let's finish Republic, and then start stockpiling gold until this thing is resolved and we can enter the next era, and then use that gold to rush a library or something. Btw, are we working on any deals for Republic with any of the Bobian civs?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|