 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
I'll see if I find the quote, that should clear things up. Maybe I just read it wrong, it sounded different then on the public forum. Plus, I was wondering on UnO's story, we know it is based on the thruth, but just how far? Maybe GoW is also farming barbs.
I think I just realized why Lego wants Vox so close to them, up until now I was always puzzled, there are benefits, but none seem so great as to invite them to their continent when you have the pyramids to fuel your expansion, and you're designated builders.
It wouldn't surprise me if Lego and Vox from now on sign some kind of MPP, notice how Vondrack said somewhere they were obliged to keep them alive in case things went badly with the war? It might very well be that Vox will somewhat become the smaller brother of Lego, not exactly a vasal, but more of a brother team. Legoland knows that it won't get support from Bob when times get critical, and might certainly fear us, in which case a close partner will certainly help. And by inviting Vox, they buy their eternal friendship (well, as much as they can trust them, but it's easy to trust someone who is half your size).
I think it's safe to assume Vox will be a (smaller) power to keep thinking on if we let the Voxodus occur, certainly when it comes to Legoland. The question is: will we give this kind of opportunity to another team?
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
I realise that we can't stop a Voxodus and how it will affect our standing in the world, that's not really my point. I was just analyzing: if Lego really gets a full time MPP partner in Vox (added to coordinated research, or even 1 team on research, the other on tax), we should try to see this beforehand, and try to react to it. If we don't see possible reasons for Lego to do this (besides the already mentioned ones, of course), we can only say afterwards: "that we should have spotted, it was so obvious it would happen"
How to counter it? Difficult... maybe demand from Lego that whatever tech they gain from Vox, they will sell us at half the price if Vox refuses. Maybe we need to consult all the other teams with this proposal, surely they are also kind of involved. If Bob is in on this proposal, and the mediator role Vondrack is assuming, they might have opinions on this too. If they also think to gain (e.g. in tech) by keeping Vox alive, we might get some gifts there to, or at least some assurances.
Besides, it would be good for relations anyway.
BTW, would it be possible to ask for a general time-out publicly (say 3 days), so that we have time to do this diplo stuff? 24 hours isn't much...
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Right.. the chat just ended... which also reminds me why I don't particularly like chats, I type too much, they always end up being hours long 
We learned quite a number of things, though.
1. The deal for Theo / no Sistine clause will go through. We should ratify it asap, a message from vondrack should arrive soon. If we manage to ratify it before they play their turn, it should be offered us now.
(one question, though: it looks they have Theo for quite some time now... are any other techs already discovered? we missed this one in the rush of the past few days)
2. we need to start discussing what to research next. Aeson brought up the idea of splitting cost, where we pay them gold, so they can get to Edu faster (fastest would be 6-7 turns). Otherwise, the only real tech open is printing press, as we're going to need to wait on Vox's engineering before we can start on invention. Lego prefers to go for Astronmoy after that.
3. we keep them posted on the Voxodus plans. (Need a chat with Vox here!). They are going to settle a city in 5 turns, and add a worker to it asap. The plan was to allow Vox to poprush a spear as the place seems to be infested with barbs. we might be able to do a bit more with this information, perhaps not. For Lego, it is no option to have the city there for any longer as necessary (i.e. they want to gtift it the turn it gets settled), as it disrupts corruption... Vox's captial will be closer then their outmost city.
4. They have deals for Engineering and Chivalry, but nothing else. Further, they haven't made deals with all teams for Sistine yet, but it looks like they're close.
5. they are not planning on a peaceful GA soon! So... no Collosus, although it remains an option. There is a clause in the Vox treaty to keep an unupgraded warrior for them, so in case it's need they can start their GA like that, but Vondrack seems to prefer a peaceful start himself, in at least 30 turns.
6. they're not really interested in extra lux, before Astronomy, certainly if it means them paying gold for it. But, seeing as this is still an idea, and Aeson doesn't think it is possible, we shouldn't put anymore resources in it. They definately like to trade after astronomy
7. WM: seeing as they won't give out their map, I proposed to sell ours at 50 gold. They made clear they can't afford it now, but would be perhaps interested in buying it on a loan (which is fine for me, personally). still needs to be discussed.
Other comments will surely follow, I'll try to reread the log (that is, if I don't fall asleep half way through it). I found it quite interesting....
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
last message from Vondrack:
1. we can use Sistine as a prebuild
2. They would be willing to speed along in research towards Edu, if we help them in gold. They have an ETA of 6 turns. As a proposal, they ask for half our 100% tax income.
I responded we would bring a good offer, without disclosing our exact gold income...
So: Do we want to spend gold on Lego getting Edu sooner? I would say that, in case we get it in 6 turns, and we are not allowed to trade it on, a good deal would be about 1/4 of their cost... don't know how much this amounts too (250 gold?), but if we provide it to them before they actually do the research, that should be enough. The price for the WM should be distracted from that (so we end up with about 200 gold for Edu, if we would pay now)
3. They want to prearrange future tech-deals (which was one of the ideas we proposed in chat), and ask for prearranging Banking (us) / Astronomy (Lego). Astronomy is more expensive, but they want to wave the difference in case the first deal gets accepted.
I certainly welcome the idea of having at least one good deal for our next tech, and I don't think many will object to this. However, we need to decide quickly what we want to research in 6 turns time...
Please comment on this quickly, Legoland should not be left waiting. Certainly not on the Edu deal... I'm away for the rest of the evening, so Arrian or nye, could you respond to them in case anything gets decided today?
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
DeepO, why 200 gold+WM?
Are we seriously considering offering more than they have bargained for?
Since Lego is using the "we need gold" argument, and since we have a stronger case in that regard (a huge army to support), I see no reason in not saying- our gpt is low at the moment (without specifing anything), if we have to explain why we can't offer more.
our income over 6 turns is roughly 350, that makes 175 gold, a 40 gold discount (if we want to be nice) is 135 gold+WM. I don't think we should offer anything beyond 150 gold +WM. At this point, gold is quite important for us- for upkeep and maintenance.
Last edited by zeit on 24-06-2003 at 22:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aeson
|
 |
orangesoda
Nov 2001 time: 22:26
|
|
I think the lump sum + map is a good way to go, maybe even throw in a future luxury consideration. They only have 1 luxury (dyes?), and so we probably can only trade one of our luxuries to them. They'd want to get 1 from each other team instead of paying for a 2nd, and given Sistene (and their plans to build Cathedrals), I doubt they need/want them very badly.
I think we should coordinate the 2nd tech ETA's if possible. With the Collosus and at least a couple Libraries, we should be able to keep up with them, but pressing tech too hard is going to hurt us both (ie. Feudalism), and make the targets on our backs a bit more enticing to Bob. Maybe we should tie it into a trade for invention with ND, as then we could expect a ~15 turn ETA at the earliest, saving up gold in the interim.
Either that or we could say that 10 turns is our optimal ETA for Education. If we can make sure Astronomy shows up in roughly 25 turns, we'd have a shot at Copernicus in Hurricane. If it shows up earlier than that, I wouldn't expect us to get it at all. We'd also want to start researching Economics for Smith's in the same timeframe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
okay, so 275 for Edu would be roughly in line with Feudalism, even if it may be on the high side. Further, we'd like 40-50 for our WM. Further, a discount on the difference between astro and banking seems okay... so in total, would it be a good idea to go with the 200 gold + WM now (or in installments), including the future deal ?
All techs will come with 20-turn NDAs (see last message). And IMO this is not a bad thing.
Oh, Lego can't have an idea how much commerce we make, but knows it's better then theirs. But, they also can't have an idea on how large our military is... I doubt it that they know we are paying 100 gpt in upkeep. In total these two effects cancel out, so their guess of ~80 gpt left could come close (if they guessed that)... They also know we asked them 200 for Feud, and will expect a proposal around the same amount.
I'm still for it, the deal can certainly strengthen our relation with Lego (which remain the most stable partner, as we have no idea what will happen to Bob), it will get us to unis faster, we can start doing our research faster, and we set a precedent of a fair trade for techs.
Aeson: I support the idea of fixing etas on future techs, however 25 turns for Copernicus might be a bit too much. We still need to be faster then other teams can be on 40-turn research, and we can't stall too much or Lego will know what's going on. But, I think this is a good topic to discuss in a future chat with Lego, it has many advantages, one of which is less friction between the two teams doing most of the research.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
I still don't understand why you are so willing to give Lego so much gold for the tech: traing is not just about production costs (which seems like all we're interested in) but supply and demand as well...
In this case, Lego probably does NOT expect much from this- otherwise why say: "half of your gpt minus 40-50 gold". Again, offering 250 gold is as saying: "we earn 100gpt". I hardly believe Lego thinks so highly of us...
It doesn't look like anyone is listening to me, but how many times other teams used the: "we don't have so much gold" plea/case in order to get us to lower prices?
Why can't we do the same, let us at least TRY, explain to them our gpt is not in the sky, instead of being so eager to make it "fair" for Lego. If it doesn't work- we can negotiate and offer more, as it doesn't seem anyone here has a problem with sparing large anounts of gold.
Don't forget Lego are our main competitor now, and vice-versa: all that crap about "we don't want Bob to grow strong"- that's really convincing, given the not-so-long-ago "we don't want the GS to grow strong" expressions.
Once again, Lego didn't hesitate to bargain for what they thought of a better price before, even when it was downright insulting (like renegotiating after it seemed we agreed on a trade). I'm not saying we should do that- just explain our difficluties, offer them LESS than what we believe is "fair", because It looks like they are not expecting that much.
If that doesn't work, we can always pay more, and I doubt Lego would blow up the negotiations for a tech Bobians won't pay much for in the near future...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|