 |
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by gsmoove23
Kramerman,
Justice has a way of killing people sometimes, even with non-lethal weapons, but if done carefully then the shouts of those angry at americans will be drowned out by those who are happy to have their private property protected. Nobody's saying its an easy job, just that we don't have a choice but to do it. We chose(supposedly) to be here. |
I agree that it needs to get done, but like many have said before, its a fine line that we must balance on, and we must be careful so we do not fall. We cannot just rush in and impose law and order immediately, as many here seem to think the US should. As much as i hate anarchy, we must be careful. I am really curious how our top leadership are planning to solve this delima... i really hope its works
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Menlas
|
|
Yes, the comparison with Paris is irrelevant.
Because the new french government has been immediatly operationnal (one of De Gaulle's wishes, instead of letting US army administer the country first). What's more, french armies were the first to enter Paris, so looting or stealing was out of question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:27
|
|
When the Shah fell, wes there mass looting? What about in Belgrade when Milosevic fell? Iremember people romping around the presidential palaces, but I don;t remember government buildings being looted. Was there looting in bucharest during the violent Uprising to get rid of the regime there?
Widespread lootign following the collapse of a regime is only the norm if nothing follows the fall of the old regime, even if the rgeime, as in bucharest, fell violently. "It's a war zone" is not that valid an excuse. when we knew going in we would have to secure the areas. What is shows is an aversion by coolition commnaders to take up "nation building" and peacekeeping duties.
French, german, and Russian embassies are the territory of those states and looting them is not allowed. Ned: did you approve of the taking of hostages at the Tehran embassy in 1979? After all, the US was allied to the Shah regime, and went so far as to allow him to go to the US after he was overthrown. By your logic what happened there was understandable, after all, after decades of repression the people of Iran attacked the symbols of the regime and the allies of his dictatorship, no?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Just because they've somehow offended you does not change their allied status. They have not abrogated any treaties and while you may be privately happy of what happened you should be dismayed. Those embassies were an american responsibility since the americans are occupiers and their ransacking will be valid ammunition that anti-americans can use.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DinoDoc
|
 |
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
For Ned:
quote: France appears to change its mind about war
April 11, 2003
BY JOCELYN GECKER ASSOCIATED PRESS
PARIS-- With Saddam Hussein vanquished and Iraqis dancing in the streets of Baghdad, the French appear to have undergone an attitude adjustment about the U.S.-led war.
No one is cheering the U.S. government, but there's support for the fall of Saddam and the swift manner in which it was accomplished.
"The Americans have won the war-- in only three weeks," Le Figaro newspaper wrote in an editorial. "It is a victory for George Bush."
Absent now is the criticism that prevailed during France's bitter pre-war arguments with the United States and Britain. French leaders said Thursday they "rejoiced" in the collapse of Saddam's regime, and political analysts said the French people now wonder whether their country was right to oppose the war so staunchly.
"The French are discovering the truth-- that the coalition was efficient," said Francois Gere, director of the Paris-based Diplomatic and Defense Institute.
Before the fighting began last month, newspapers and politicians portrayed the United States and Britain as "invaders" opposed by the Iraqi people, Gere said.
"Instead we see pictures of Iraqi people celebrating-- not only the arrival of British and U.S. forces, but celebrating the end of a regime," Gere said.
His words were echoed by Philippe Moreau Defarges of the French Institute of International Relations.
"We're seeing a subtle shift," Defarges said. "We are starting to hear a more dissonant voice in France. The U.S. victory has made the debate more complex."
French newspaper editorials still retained a healthy dose of skepticism, questioning the whereabouts of Saddam's alleged weapons of mass destruction and focusing on the challenge of postwar reconstruction.
But in the war's first two weeks, French media went heavy with coverage of Iraqi civilian casualties and scenes of suffering.
The weekly news magazine Le Point featured an American soldier on its cover under the headline, "The Tragedy." Le Figaro magazine showed an American soldier trudging through the mud beneath the question: "Iraq-- A New Vietnam?"
On Thursday, media criticism was aimed squarely at the fallen Saddam. Several newspapers and TV news magazines ran lengthy features on the cruelty of his regime.
"The dictator who terrorized Iraq," was the title of a two-page spread in Le Monde newspaper.
At Paris bus stops and cafes, people enthusiastically welcomed Saddam's ouster, but were mixed about the U.S. role.
"For a long time, the Iraqi people needed to revolt against Saddam Hussein-- but couldn't do it alone," said Jacques Bidot, waiting for a bus near the Champs-Elysees.
But he dismissed the TV images of exuberant Iraqis as "a lot of propaganda."
While the French government stopped short of saying so, leading politicians insisted Thursday that France was right to oppose the war.
"Two weeks ago, everyone was taking their hats off to France," said former Prime Minister Alain Juppe. "Today they're starting to say we were wrong. We have nothing to regret." |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Yet the per capita income didn't significantly decline until 1991.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Most of the american stations (except fox, don't watch it) are reporting lawlessness all over. I'm american dude, watchin the same stuff you do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
DD :
I don't know, but I assume the quick fall of Baghdad, and the collapse of the regime went against the grim predictions. For the two first weeks of the war, a good chunk of the coverage was about the stiff resistance from the Iraqi army down south, and the transformation of Baghdad into a fortress.
The fact that Baghdad fell, with much less blood than expected, was a relief and a joy.
However, the French media has always been skeptical, even the very day of Baghdad's fall : pictures of worried or angry Iraqis were shown along the cheering ones.
Today, I have seen many pictures of the scenes of anarchy and looting in Baghdad, and reports on neighborhood militias, but I've also seen an 'exclusive' (dunno if the exclusivity is worldwide or Francewide) report about Baghdad's empty torture center.
Note : by "the French media", I only mean France2, the big public channels whose info is more liberal than its private counterpart (despite not being extremistic). I am almost not exposed to the rest of my media, since I spend most of my time in front of the computer.
Another explanation could be the massive presence of French journalists in Baghdad, who could have personally felt the collapse of the regime and witnessed the scenes of joy in the streets.
Besides, we've seen many pictures from the Iraqi propaganda (at least on France2), so I suppose it was part of the deal not to criticize Saddam in exchange of a bed in the Palestine Hotel.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|