 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Colon
|
 |
Antwerp, Colon's Chocolate Canard Country
Jan 1970 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Ata:
I am not talking about only Aesthetics, although for me and many others ( as you can see in this thread! ), Skyscrapers are a thing of beauty.
Skyscrapers can be not only magnificent and inspiring by their immensity and design, as the cathedrals of old, but are also very important and healthy for the developement of human habitat.
Without skyscrapers, what we'll have is eternal urban sprawl, with suburbia everywhere you go. Skyscrapers are the ones to give a fighting chance for the future of green pastures, woods, rolling hills and sandy beaches. |
You gotta be fair, they can be real ugly 
But there are a lot of nice skycrapers too, I posted some of them in this thread. The Commerzbank HQ in Frankfurt, the HSBC building in Hong Kong. The Empire State is just stunning, not just because it's so huge, but because it's simple yet beautiful. A true modern day cathedral, if you want.
Not all of them of big grey/grown boxes, especially Asia has lots of nicer ones.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Well, it is a gouverment buildiing, what do you want
btw, you should the statue they put in front of it
|
your government saves money on architects? for shame.
Government building in Tel Aviv ( to be finished in a couple of months )

another one that Sail thingee that I posted in the previous pages.
So, so far, so good. They're not something amazing, but they're ok, and are not very boring.
quote: My point was that while skyscrapers can indeed look wonderful I do not think they fit into european cities without breaking their flair.
That to answer your question why there are so few in Europe. Because obviously i am not alone with my opinion.
And if you think skycrapers save nature then wait when those living there have enough money to buy a weekend house in the countryside.
I mean who wants to spend his whole life in a flat? I can't imagine that. Just think of the kids or the pets.
|
Ata, I don't think they'll break their flair. It didn't break London's or Paris' flair, did it?
quote:
And if you think skycrapers save nature then wait when those living there have enough money to buy a weekend house in the countryside.
I mean who wants to spend his whole life in a flat? I can't imagine that. Just think of the kids or the pets.
|
I've lived my entire life in a flat. It's great. I have a dog, and he's doing great too. ( He's a small dog, but very energetic. That's what walks are for! )
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
there arent too many quakes. if major quakes were terrorism israel would only have one suicide bomber every 5 or 6 years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
look up the stats on the 89 earthquake in San Francisco and 94 earthquake in LA. i dont think that its that different in fatality wise to a terrorist attack. money wise it is much more expensive but thats the breaks for a few people
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
I got by fine on the 89 quake. and i lived on landfill...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
it was more like "lets fill the bay in with a bunch of dirt and put overpriced housing on it" kind of projects. they did the same thing in the marina district in san francisco and it was hard hit by the 89 quake. of course that was on 1915 technology for the worlds fair.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|