 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:28
|
|
Sorry guys, no time to read all the discussions here, I'm again hit with that terrible disease some refer to as RL 
actually, partly that is not so bad, as one of these weeks some change could finally happen in my g/f situation (which is none existing, for those who don't know). Partly I just drown in work.
Just a few things: I officially give my ambassador position to RP to OPD (well, actually, I was only interim ambassador), I'd like to keep Lego. However, I can't promise day-to-day attendance (it has been several days since I browsed the forum), so if someone would please keep my seat warm if something needs to be done, I'd appreciate it.
Keep up the good work, and give them hell (well, at least Vox),
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Theseus

|
 |
The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm! Apolyton Spirit!!
Apr 2002 time: 00:28
|
|
"Several times in the Civ3 Strat forum, I noticed the idea that it was not so important to OWN a great wonder, as it was to DENY it to others. Now, can this be applied to wars and allies? If one warring side tells me "yeah, no problem, we can handle that, don't worry" (read: no deal available) and the other one says "look, we cannot make it on our own, we'd really appreciate if you could support us, even indirectly - if you can help us here with this, we could give you that..." (read: a deal available). So, what does a civ having no interest in either warring party winning the war do? Yes, right, it sticks to doing business. Wherever it is available."
- From Vondrack's post on the public thread.
__________________________________
Why are we not negotiating out-game alliances with in-game currency?
Our 'friends' are being pretty obvious about this... both in reference to the now and to history.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:28
|
|
Guys,
I wanted to catch up with the diplomatic things going on, but that's not easy... we may be reviving our diplomatic strategy (for which I'm happy), but we're also getting sloppy in the progress. The idea of logs worked fine up until a few weeks ago, so why aren't they being updated now? I see PMs and chats all over the place, and without going over everything (which I don't have the time for), I can't make a coherent picture 
Could you please go back in very precisely adding all diplomatic contact to the logs, so we can keep track? And, please top those again, I don't care if we have 10 topped threads, if that means I can find stuff in seconds instead of needing to spend hours reading everything.
thanks,
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:28
|
|
Yeah, sorry about my last post, I noticed it wasn't so bad as I expected. some messages seem to miss, however most are there... but still, topping those threads again would make it more overseeable 
Nice going on the diplo front, BTW, it seems in the current crisis, we're doing better then average, all things considering. RPs changing attitude surprises me (allthough I always considered them opportunistic), but I'm especially surprised with Lego. It's quite obvious Vox wants to retreat towards them, but discussion about this has been going on since the start of this war. IIRC vondrack asked me in one of the last chats I had with him if we would be angry if they offered Vox refuge, to which I replied that that was most likely not our concern, as long as they were off our continent (as we couldn't trust them). Nothing has changed since then, only become more extreme.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|