 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
Boris, doesn't it scare you he's merely exaggerating tendencies that are most clearly deep inside of most people?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
bah. most people (in Europe) are filled with anti-semitism, too. I see it every day. shameful.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Provost Harrison
|
 |
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
That's all very well, but what about a faithful partner? Rules and regulations ensure that the faithful partner remains protected in the event that the marriage breaks down. Removing the legal structure ensures that there will be no legal protection, because there will be no way to declare the relationship.
Relationships, yes, but marriages? More than half do remain stable for life.
Life sucks, but that does not mean we should get rid of the parts that are good. Marriage benefits many people, and should still be kept.
|
Well if you have shared property it has to be divided up anyway in the event of a division...and should depend on children too...why is this an issue...too often in the past has the 'till death us do part' been a way of keeping females down and faithful with no hope of escape from an abusive husband...or a ball and chain used to keep the other partner at bay. Now I admit, I am not one of the biggest romantics but marriage seems completely and utterly outmoded from my perspective...
And even if 50% of marriages 'last', it still means that a significant proportion do not. And besides, if the marriage lasted why wouldn't the relationship if the bonds formed between the couple are so strong?
And with regards to Bodd's...I've had many years of him, and I know him personally...it is best just to ignore him, trust me 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
quote:
I know several married couples who were capable of conceiving, but adopted instead. Is that wrong, yes or no?
|
Nothing wrong with a married couple choosing to adopt.
quote:
I know several married couples who were capable of conceiving, but simply chose not to have kids. Is that wrong, yes or no?
|
Irrelevent to the issue at hand. Choosing not to have kids does not bring a third party into play. You're trying to have me back into a different argument. 
It's not wrong, but not really a good choice. One of the expectations of a marriage is to produce a family. There are other options, if you are not planning to have kids than to get married.
Eh, now I have to exempt adoption from the other examples, from in-vitro, etc. I don't agree with in-vitro unless one of the parties actually is infertile.
The reason why adoption is different than the other examples is that the child is already here, and needs a loving family. In-vitro seeks to conceive a child.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
under 10% of the population is anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Would you like to tell her that since it's through a third party |
Go on then, Woss your boss' email address?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
that's just MrGa.. err, MrFun being himself...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|