 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:36
|
|
Most schools will have windows though, so I doubt gas would work as well as the theatre which did not have windows, but whose air was circulated via air conditioning.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:36
|
|
You know I don't know why Russians are so at odds with americans. You have your own islamic problem just as we do and yet you still oppose us going into iraq? How many children did Saddam kill? How many people did he kill? We violated international law by going in? I think not. We had 14 broken resolutions and a long history of crimes against humanity committed by Saddam to provide plenty of justification to remove him. Russia would be so much better off if they worked with the US rather than fighting us. It makes no sense to me why a country that could obviously benefit from cooperation with the US (especially economically) still opposes us while their children are being killed by the islamic threat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:36
|
|
Saddam was hardly an islamic extremist though whatever Bush/Blair and co say now. The Baathist party was more authoritarian/fascist if anything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:36
|
|
I never said he was an islamic extremist, but there is plenty of evidence that he worked with them. Saddam is just one piece of the problems with the middle east. Iran and Syria will be next until the Islamic extremist plague has been wiped out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:36
|
|
I'm guessing the use of female homicide bombers will become more and more of a trend. My prediction is that if democracy in Iraq fails and more attacks on the US and other nations occur in increasing number that sooner or later the world is going to lose patience and clean house.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Russian army certainly isn't much weaker than the American army |
I guess this isn't the thread for it, and of course the US isn't going to become involved unless in something discrete (like providing the gas to knock these people out or whatever), but you don't actually believe that do you? A professional force versus a conscript force? Discipline. Training. Doctrine. Logistics. Supply. Speed. Etc.
That's not to say the US Army would have done much better in Chechnya, but at least it would have failed in a much different way than the Russian army did.
Last edited by DanS on 01-09-2004 at 23:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:36
|
|
quote: I guess this isn't the thread for it, and of course the US isn't going to become involved unless in something discrete (like providing the gas to knock these people out or whatever), but you don't actually believe that do you? |
And you believe there is a significant difference? Yes, the American army has better equipment and technology, generally. There also seem to be less stupid problems. However, in terms of raw firepower, there's no real difference, and that's not counting nukes (if you count them, both USA and Russia can obliterate each other or anyone else).
If there was a conventional conflict between Russia and USA with full raw power of both countries, it would result in near-total annihilation of both, though America would win.
And to your edit, Russian biggest problem is of course that they are a conscript army, indeed. But don't underestimate the power of Russian infantrymen with AK-47s. They wouldn't be easy target practice for US Marines with M16s.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|