 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:20
|
|
TS,
quote: Sometimes someone may do something you don't agree with, it's not that they are dumb, they just have different motivations and experiences than you do. |
Yeah, and I'm not concerned about intelligent people who vote based on legitimate convictions (I still think popular vote is a shitty way to determine what taxes I pay, for example). My problem is the idiots who are influenced by political attack ads, what their preacher says on Sunday, or people who cast votes with no concern for how their votes will affect the freedom of others.
quote: So give me your criteria for who can vote and who can't? |
Actually, I wouldn't be at all concerned with who votes and doesn't vote, if the federal and state government were more limited, and those limitations were actually enforced. A "voter mandate" is, or at least can be, extremely dangerous to individual liberty.
MrFun,
quote: I am not concerned about someone's intelligence as a qualification for a RIGHT to vote. |
And I really don't consider voting to be a right, or even a legitimate individual liberty - if the concern is individual rights and liberties, then those are better protected by a Constitution strongly limiting the powers of government that is strictly enforced than by a mass of moronic voters who vote for whoever promises them the most stuff.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wiglaf
|
 |
Cambridge
Dec 2000 time: 23:20
|
|
Ozzy, you claim that kids would self-regulate (ie idiots wouldn't go to the polls) but you say that adults do not. Why is there a distinction there?
Seems to me that kids wouldn't necessarily self-regulate. And you've got to admit that some kids are just not going to make the right decisions for the country. Most of them in fact.
Edit to add specific reference-
Ozzy suggesting the youth will self-regulate:
quote: Also, for all age groups those individuals who are uninformed, unintelligent and immature aren't going to bother going to the polls on election day and casting a ballot in the first place. Its self regulating. |
Ozzy suggesting adults will not self-regulate:
quote: In the twisted world we live in, being a metally retarded adult with an IQ of 12 and an age of 40 has a right to vote whereas a Harvard graduate and genious at age of 16 doesn't. This is unjust discrimination, entirely divorced from all meaning and reasonableness |
Last edited by Wiglaf on 25-10-2004 at 06:22
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
sholdn't Ozzie be your hero Wiglaf?
I mean, he was actually on Fox News
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Wiglaf
|
 |
Cambridge
Dec 2000 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: quote:
--------------------------
Originally posted by David Floyd
What, are Democrats saying that blacks are less intelligent? That's pretty racist
---------------------------
Nah, just that IQ tests don't measure intelligence without significant skews for social and cultural reasons (amongst others).
|
What a toolish answer. So many blacks bomb IQ tests because they either don't go to school or go to a bad school, and many get into college ratherly generously. An IQ test would "disenfranchise" some blacks because, due to their (and perhaps their family's) utter lack of education, they simply aren't intelligent.
The sooner you PC types realize this the quicker these people and their children can be educated. Otherwise the test is unfair for "social and cultural reasons." What patronizing crap.
Last edited by Wiglaf on 25-10-2004 at 06:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OzzyKP
|
 |
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wiglaf
No, not really, and I get the feeling you're ignoring my arguments now.
99% of teenagers do not deal with feeding families, or holding serious jobs. Most flip burgers to pay for videogames, or work summer jobs to pay off cell phone minutes. They would not seriously consider voting Kerry or Bush based solely on the economics of their job at Burger King. And if they did, it would be a stupid vote anyway, and in an election where 500 votes can swing the balance, that's pretty important. |
Who are you to judge the reasons a person decides to vote? Just because they might not be your reasons, doesn't mean they aren't valid reasons.
But if you want to make that argument, that you need to be "feeding families" to count in this society. Then how about we disenfranchise everyone on welfare, everyone on social security, everyone drawing a pension, and hell, all single people too while we're at it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
Ozzy-
What age were you advocating voting be lowered to?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
We already do take civics and government classes. |
The last government course I was required to take was in 9th grade, granted that was probably around, say 92?
different schools obviously do things differently. At mine, we had a current events-type class that was purely optional.
I'm talking about a class purely focused on the election and issues. If your school has that, then bully for you and your school. If kids your age could actually vote, then a class like that would actually have meaning, rather than a regular bs hs course.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|