 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:20
|
|
You can laugh all you want. There are people in mental hospitals yucking it up with you. My system would have more freedom in regards to choosing the path of your life and living out your dreams. When society gets to a certain size, having children ceases to become a right and becomes a privilage. Overpopulation is a problem. Irresponsible parenting is a problem. For some reason you think that I have some huge screening process dedicated to only letting certain people have children. Yes and no... good, moral, responsible people can have children. If you are evil, immoral, and irresponsible, you cannot have children. But I guess you think that those things aren't important. In a perfect world, you wouldn't need a government to tell you who's evil, immoral, and irresponsible, and who's not. But this world isn't perfect. Neither is my world... but it's a step in the right direction. And yes, because you have no imagination and vision when it comes to solving problems, you are narrow minded. Instead of offering suggestions and constructive criticism, you insult. For that, you are narrow minded.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Akka
|
 |
In front of my computer.
Nov 2001 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: Yes and no... good, moral, responsible people can have children. If you are evil, immoral, and irresponsible, you cannot have children. |
And who is about to judge what is "good, moral and responsible" ? And how ? I do believe in absolute Good and Bad, but I highly doubt that you have the same definition of it than I do.
quote: And yes, because you have no imagination and vision when it comes to solving problems, you are narrow minded. Instead of offering suggestions and constructive criticism, you insult. For that, you are narrow minded. |
Blowing hot air.
I suggest to improve the actual society and at the same time to respect the essence of humanity, and never to fall in an authoritarian society.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
No, you were supposed to show why:
1. (A & B) -> C
2. ~(A -> C)
3. ~(B -> C)
That was the argument you were making earlier. I was wondering why each assertion is true. |
which would be done by proving that (A&B) = C
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:20
|
|
Akka, it's important you separate me from sixchan...
Having said that...
The guidelines for the screening process would be set up by a commitee of psychologists, sociologists, medical doctors, theologins, therapists, and various legal experts.
Don't think that I would begin to outline this process. I know and respect my own ignorance. Others are better equipped to decide this matter. But I believe such a process is necessary.
Maybe if I become qualified to partake in that process, I will.
"One who claims to know, but does not, is unwise... one who does not know, and knows he does not know is wise..." to paraphrase Socrates...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|