 |
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
Do we want to play dumb regarding their apparent deception, then, rather than calling them on it?
Remember that when we first met Vox, they already had Ceremonial Burial. Suppose they researched that themselves, and then Pottery, before starting on Iron Working. If it weren't for the fact that Iron Working costs less than it should for us to research, I would regard that as a valid explanation. (Of course assuming they're lying, that may be what they hope we believe to make the lie sound plausible.)
One thing I don't want to do at this point is start on Writing until Iron Working is firmly in hand. With how untrustworthy Vox seems to be, there is a non-trivial risk that the deal won't go through, in which case we need to research Iron Working ASAP and gold for upgrades might come in very handy. After all, if they're untrustworthy on other matters, why should we believe a word about their desire for peace?
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
Personally I think that the next two turns makes or breaks the game for Vox. And even if they do trade, I highly doubt any future trades with them, since we can outresearch them considerably and due to their duplicitous nature.
So
Does an undeclared state of war now exist between vox and gathering storm?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeepO
7. Spacing lessons, part 1.
True, we have recently settled our 3 city, |
I would avoid telling them of our third city......
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
I think its a good idea to tell them our suspicions and why we think what we do. Of course, we can be much more tactful than they, that letter was apparently typed by a small boy.
Tell them that they are offbase with their accusations of another contact, prove it by the histograph. This is irrefutable evidence, as the movements in the graph should be roughly similar to theirs, although slightly different due tot the third civ.
fire back that we have concerns about their truthfulness and why.
(maybe they are throwing this out as a smokescreen, perhaps they were hoping to get another two turns in for their warmachine) (as long as we can see 3 warriors, that means three warriors not upgradeable)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
I don't see why, they have exactly the same information in their F8-screen. Theirs is even more informative, because it shows the extra civ they met. The score screen displays nothing than a graph of the score numbers, accessible for everyone every turn. I wouldn't know why I should pay a price for it. |
Sir Ralph, you miss my point. Sorry about not being too clear about it, I type as I think... not always very good for nice explanations 
I don't want to pay any price for it, a simple trade should be enough. No extra cash, if they want to know our situation, they need to pay (in the form of information of Civ X, but we don't tell that).
What I want to avoid is having them tell us that they can't do it, because they don't want to reveil Civ X. Fine, so cover it. paintbrush their F8, giving the civ a neutral color (white), remove their names and anything else leading to them, and trade that F8 with ours. We know a lot more, and they can trust us.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeepO
Why? If they can't see that, they're morons. I'm sure most other teams suspect it... we have been topping the F11 screen for a while now.
DeepO |
I see.
I still would avoid telling them our exact strength. Maybe they think we have more than 3 cities?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
Here's what I have so far of my draft response. I'll let you go ahead and look over what I've done so far while I work on finisihing it.
quote: Greetings BetaHound and Vox Controli,
On the subject of cows and bulls (and what comes from them), our analysts find it almost impossible to believe that you do not already have Iron Working. According to their analysis (and this was originally conducted the turn before the last one we took, although I have since confirmed the figures personally), Iron Working should cost us twice as much to research as Warrior Code if no nation we know has either. Similarly, Writing should require one third more research than Iron Working. Since you are our only in-game contact at present (your suspicions notwithstanding), our analysts say that only your having researched a technology should create a deviation between anticipated and actual research costs.
With every other technology we can consider researching, costs (as best we can pin them down) follow a consistent pattern. But the cost of Iron Working is lower than it ought to be if you have not yet researched it, and at the rate we can research Iron Working, we ought to be able to research Writing one turn faster than we can – unless the contact situation makes Iron Working cheaper relative to its theoretical cost. If you are telling the truth, there is some great mystery here by which the assumptions our analysts base their work on is invalid. But I hope you can see why we would be extremely skeptical regarding your claims of not yet having discovered Iron Working. Either you are lying to us, or our understanding of the world we live in is seriously flawed.
Regarding our own research rate, if you have been watching the Roster of Great Cities, I’m sure you have seen that Eye of the Storm has been consistently at least size 3 and often size 4 on the International City Size Scale for quite some time. Eye of the Storm has not worked land producing less than two commerce in centuries, and Hurricane has sometimes had access to two commerce and sometimes just one depending on priorities of the moment. Add to that the commerce from the city sites themselves (with capitals inherently being especially wealthy) and you can see for yourself that our research rate, although quite rapid, is not impossible. (And I should note that at Sir Ralph’s insistence, we had already started researching Alphabet based on your conditional acceptance of the trade proposal before you sent your final acceptance, leaving us a turn ahead of where we would have been had more cautious policies prevailed.)
Next, in regard to your claim that Bronze Working was worth more to us than The Wheel was to you, the fact that we would have researched Bronze and then Iron ourselves had you not agreed to the deal renders such short-term comparisons irrelevant. On that path, we would have had Bronze Working in plenty of time to build any spearmen we might want, and would be getting Iron Working through our own research about the same time we will get it from you assuming you keep your word. So the true benefits of the exchange are in terms of long-term prosperity, not short-term military advantage, and on that basis, the agreement was clearly in your favor. We, unlike you, sacrificed a turn’s research to make the deal work. Further, based on what you have indicated about your own research rate, a trade at equal value saves you significantly more research time than it does us compared with each doing the research ourselves. And that is not even considering the risk on our side and (I assume) hope on yours that you might be able to exchange The Wheel and/or Alphabet for gold and/or additional knowledge. (We never requested a patent on either of those technologies and, in fact, explicitly acknowledged your right to trade them when we proposed the trade agreement. The patent concept is strictly in connection with trades involving Writing and beyond.)
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
I agree it is good.
What about the f8 screen with citizens blacked out. yay or nay? I say yay. doesnt cost us anything and doesn't reveal anything they don't already know.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeepO
F8: if possible, I want to trade for it. They learn a small bit of information from us, we may want to ask for something back
DeepO |
what information do they learn from us, other than that we are alone. we need to establish that fact, so I think giving it away would be appropriate. It is up to us to prove that we are alone, luckily we can easily do just that. But lets vote on that. Eitherway it would be fine with me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Well.. I doubt they are going to do it, but if I get my hands on a F8 with 2 civs including my own, while I already have 3 civs including my own, it's a small effort to subtract the two graphs, separating the three civs perfectly. It will give them more precise information than what they get now, as Civ X's power graph is interfering. We see when they are cashing some gold, but now, they don't know if this is our gold, or rather Civ X's gold that's tilting the graph.
Again, I agree on giving them F8, but at least propose to deal for it. If they do it, we know a little more.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeepO
Well.. I doubt they are going to do it, but if I get my hands on a F8 with 2 civs including my own, while I already have 3 civs including my own, it's a small effort to subtract the two graphs, separating the three civs perfectly. It will give them more precise information than what they get now, as Civ X's power graph is interfering. We see when they are cashing some gold, but now, they don't know if this is our gold, or rather Civ X's gold that's tilting the graph. |
That could be a significant issue with the power graph, but I wouldn't be nearly as concerned about their ability to squeeze extra information out of the score graph.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
I just want to throw out another possibility: maybe Vox has fabricated this whole thing to have a "valid" excuse for backing out of the deal. What can they gain from this? Well, they can start war preperations quietly without having to strengthen us at the same time (by giving us IW).
Dominae
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|