 |
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Theseus
So...
I am happily surprised that the diplomats have brought us to this point. Kudos, and well done!! A tense situation resolved...
But what have we learned? Vox is WEAK! What can we gain from them? Their current techs... and not much else, other than civ contacts.
I don't mean to be a total warmonger, but they don;t seem much like an effective research partner to me, and they stand in the way of contact (i.e., cheaper techs)...
AND, on top of their actions / attitude to date, remember that we face Immortals.
Trade of all sorts is fine, and I value the benefits... but warfare must come. |
I'd prefer to keep open the possibility of peace, if only so the ambassadorial staff can hold out hope to Vox without lying through our teeth. And it's even possible that we might find a better opening for warfare elsewhere if by some miracle we and Vox can get a solid partnership going to whatever extent they are able to contribute.
It would be more convenient if the war drums could be put on hold until we're ready to start direct preparations to launch an attack, which won't be for quite some time yet. (Not that we can't start doing things like building barracks and building up defensive forces that could also be converted to an offensive role when and if needed.)
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Theseus
I've been assuming "Thud" is the Voxian translation of "Grog," unless Sir Ralph renamed a warrior without telling us. |
No.
/EDIT: Oh darn, I by accident edited this post, instead of replying with quote... Sorry about this. --SR
Last edited by Sir Ralph on 14-01-2003 at 12:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
The exchange of technology is inspiring optimism, as it should, and talks of letting Vox grow alongside us, as long as we feel unprepared for war are gaining a majority- as it seems from those who deny my suggestion to go for a blocking movement against Vox's inevitable southern expansion. with that said, i must say that i see this course of action (focusing on our immediate benefit from settling to the south) as one that with careful planning and wise diplomatic move could probably maintain growth momentum, keep earning us techs and securing our holdings with military power as well.
But, i think that some action towards the end of denying Vox of fertile land, and a stable foothold beyond the isthmus is necessary as well, and despite it's cost will bring us a tremendous advantage in the coming conflict- which you all realize going to come some day. This, IMO, can be achieved without jeprodizing our growth that much, and to thwart any threat from Vox (a real threat, like one that would come if we let them establish several cities deep into our territory).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Might i ask, what about their roading effort south of the isthmus, they carry on with it, having complete control on the land south of it and are status? one warrior standing on the mountain as an observer, while they practically can move their warriors just around it, and put some more of their "observers" along key point near our territory- while we allow ourselves to leave only one guard there, and send the other south for some non-urgent scouting of few coast tiles.
I think this is a serious risk we're taking, we are signaling the Vox that strategic strong points are unimportant for us, and that we are willing to make cmpromises on land issues without any demand on our part.
We can't let this coninue, Vox definitely doesn't appreciate our gestures of goodwill- they keep their roading effort- an obvious preparation for invasion, while we retreat our warriors, why?
return that one scouting the coast up there, and block their futher approach.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by zeit
We can't let this coninue, Vox definitely doesn't appreciate our gestures of goodwill- they keep their roading effort- an obvious preparation for invasion, while we retreat our warriors, why? |
I won't regard their actions as an "obvious preparation for invasion" until they start roading jungles, and if they want to build roads so our WC's can get through to attack them, I for one have no intention of complaining. Especially not when using a worker for that hinders their growth and productivity.
But my bet is that they're aiming to found their fourth city 9-9 from Grog's position, and their idea is to have the worker build a road there and then start improving the area. If they have as little land with a decent amount of food closer to home as they make it sound, that would hardly be an unreasonable move, especially with the two bonus grasslands there. Last I heard, the strategy of using workers to road to new city sites instead of keeping them busy around home was still considered a valid one, not that it's one I generally favor.
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
alva
|
 |
Republic of Flanders
Sep 2001 time: 06:24
|
|
Didn't RP told us they were on a different continent all together?
Last edited by alva on 17-01-2003 at 23:21
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|