 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
should we tell them we know lux?
I think maybe we shuodl
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
woohoo
Greetings Jon and People of Vox Controli:
After extensive discussion and debate (and a bit of scrambling to adjust to
Dissidentville's location), Gathering Storm has come to a strong consensus
ratifying the enclosed border treaty proposal. (I had to adjust one of our
city locations to make it viable with Dissidentville where it is, and
another because one of our generals wanted to make absolutely certain that
cultural disparities could not cost us control of an iron source.) If this
would be acceptable to you, we can have the stability that comes with
predefined borders so that both our nations can focus squarely on building
up our economies in our nations' cores. That will make both our economies
much stronger, both for research and for production, than if we waste early
cities on a land grab in high-corruption areas. It will also help us lay a
stronger and more stable groundwork for possible (and I like to think highly
probable) future partnership in other areas.
By the way, we're sorry if Hack's recent movement caused you any concern.
Your settler happened to come south at a time when Grog was away from his
normal post hunting barbarians, which raised a theoretical possibility that
other units could have come with the settler. Hack's new position ensures
that he can let us know in the unlikely event that units that accompanied
the settler might move farther south.
Sincerely,
The People of Gathering Storm
Nathan Barclay, Chief Economist
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:25
|
|
BTW - I have been engaged with BigFurryMonster of lux regarding the botched up trade arrangement. I posted my earlier letter. He had questions. Here is my response.
Re: Trade Deal - part 2
Hi BFM.
A first tier tech is one in the first row of the ancient era, or the left hand column in the F6 screen. The idea is that a first tier tech is one that many civs have already, and that many got from barbarian huts. In other words, despite the beaker cost, they are of lesser value.
The two relevant messages from Lux are the ones I sent. I agree that neither says 'we will give you our next tech'. But they clearly refer to the longer term deal, including having Lux tell us what WE should research next. We went along with the spirit and intent of the deal, on the assumption that you would research another tech and then we would trade.
There are two ways of looking at such an arrangement - the first is what Calc has called 'socialistic'. Under this arrangement all techs are shared with the other party as soon as they become available. And research paths are co-ordinated to make sure there is no duplication of effort. This is the arranagement we thought we had entered into. If you read the two messages received from Calc with this approach in mind - you will see where we were on a different page than you. Partcularly the note below where Calc says he wants to hear what we would like in return for mysticism.
The other way of looking at the arrangement is on a trade-by-trade basis. Which I now understand is the way Calc and Trip were looking at it. But under that arrangement, the first deal was not good for you, and the second - ie we turn over mysticism to even out that past deal - is definitely not good for us. Now - to even the books, I made a proposal - Warrior Code, a first tier tech, and 35 gold. (15 now, and 1gpt).
I trust this makes it clearer as to where we were and are coming from on this. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need further clarifiaction.
Cheers! ... Beta.
quote:
BigFurryMonster wrote on 03-02-2003 07:40:
Hello, Beta!
We at Lux headquarters have some discussion going on on the exact nature of the trade agreement. It would help a lot if you could provide me with the message from us that (according to you) says we're giving you our next tech.
And what exactly do you mean by "first tier tech"? (I'm not a native speaker of English and do not know the word 'tier')
BFM
quote:
part 2 of 2 of my message to calc
As you can see, we have alot to offer you. We have no desire to withhold any strategically valuable tech to you, since we feel very safe with the people of Vox. Our natural boundaries provide little to dispute over and our common heritage of being latin-decent as well as common love for science makes Vox one of our favorite. If we can cooperate in tech buddying, it would be to your best interest since we have so much to offer you as of now. Please take serious consideration in planning mysticism as your next technological project. I would also like to hear what you guys want to work out for us recieving mysticism as soon as you guys discover it. We are open to suggestions, and we are very lenient right now, so please take advantage and accept this proposal.
I wish to hear from you again.
Calc
etc
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BetaHound
Who is handling the contact with GoW? Jon? Witt or Diss- do you want a turn as Voice of Foreign affairs?
I think we should tell them we know Lux - not sure about GS.
Also - in response to GS' letter and the screen shot sent with the city sites - note that they are essentially claiming the one source of iron. I thought that they indicated they have another source further south. There original plan did not have that city so close to the mountains. I think they moved it when we put Dissidentville in one square further south. |
uh oh, I already told them that we knew GS (I thought that it was known by everyone)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Beta, I would prefer
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
(I wil be resposible for our allies, GS)_
btw, I think it is tine to exchange maps with them
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:25
|
|
Sent this to Picahulu of Neu D this morning. Hope you don't mind me sharing a bit - but I think this could be a key relationship to allowing us to expand. And sooner than later - ie as soon as we can get galleys and Immortals set to go.
Friendship and the Future
Picahulu - esteemed minister for the great nation of Neu Demogyptica.
It was with great pleasure that I received your recent note. I very much enjoyed our early dialogue, and now that the game has progressed, it is important that we talk again. My sense has always been that Neu D is a civilization we could trust, and given that our early existence in this game has had its moments of tension, we look forward to establishing some firm friendships in this world. Friendships where our respective goals compliment each other, as oppose to competing against each other. And a friend we can rely on to stand beside us when things get tough, and vice-versa.
We very much look forward to meeting you in the game. We are obviously on a smaller continent to the east of yours. It runs roughly north-south. We inhabit the north, and smaller end of the continent. Our neighbours to the south are Gathering Storm. We got off to a tense start with GS regarding exploration and expansion rights, but have since established much better relationships, and have recently agreed to the positioning of cities and our border. We have conducted technology trades with them.
Our geography is rugged - and in fact - the northern part of our lands are separated from the southern part of the continent by a one tile 'chokepoint', soon to be a city. This has made us feel somewhat secure. Our early efforts went to expansion and major road construction; we are now concentrating on city growth and economic development.
Now - a matter of common interest. We contacted Lux Invicta over a straight of water that separates our continent from yours. Things started off friendly enough, and trade arrangements were made. It has now become clear that there was a misunderstanding regarding the arrangements, and Lux is claiming that we agreed to a deal which would be very much in their favour. We disagree. As the last part of this deal involves us sending them a technology we are just completing, we are holding out for a re-negotiation. However, we have not heard from them lately, and I presume they are occupied with other concerns.
The northen end of the continent you are on is very close to our capitol - and is only separated by the straight of water. I presume Lux is the closest civ to us, given that we contacted them next. And then I assume you are their closest neighbours. I think we can both see where our common interest lies. Now - if only we had galleys ..... (grumble, mumble).
You might also be interested to hear that Lux did not speak very well of you when we first met them. They accused you of breaking deals, etc, etc. Given our recent experience with them, we have our own ideas of where the truth lies.
So my friend, I have shared a fair bit of where we are at. And perhaps more than our other senators may approve of. But I have a good feeling about our potential realtionship, and I do believe we can share an early common interest. To say nothing of the trade possibilities. Our friends to the south, Gathering Storm, are eager to engage in multi-national trading arrangements, and we have directed our respective research paths in that regards.
I look forward to hearing from you. You should also note that if you can get a unit to the north-east tip of the continent, we could meet in the game, and enable a true trading relationship. But for now, we would like to learn of the rest of the world, of your experiences so far, and your opinion on the 'common interest' I have suggested.
My regards to you, Borc, and the rest of the leaders of Neu Demogyptica. May your nation and its people live long and prosper!
With sincerity and friendship - BetaHound, Voice of Foreign Affairs, Vox Controli.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:25
|
|
And just received from BFM of Lux. What a bunch of bozos they are.
Trades
Hi BH,
Thank you for your message. I can see now how we were on different pages in the big trade book. That is bad. Bad for you and bad for us, since it causes confusion and yields little trade.
You say that - evaluating trade by trade - the deal of giving IW to you was bad for us. You're right.
You also say that the deal of giving Myst to us is bad for you. Again, you're right.
But only if you look at each trade individually.
I feel that Vox and Lux need to be in a long-term trade relationship. Not a 'socialistic' one as you call it. But one in which both civs tell each other what they are researching (themselves) and then work out a deal. This can be done on a one-to-one basis, with gold to make up the difference between techs of different values.
In this light, let's evaluate the deals. First, let me stress that the Pottery deal is one that was conducted outside of the IW and Myst deals. We agreed to sell it to you for some gold, and I think that this was certainly not overpaid.
Then, the Myst for IW deal. We saved you 11 turns of research on IW, for the promise of getting Myst. We took a risk there. Although we feel that this is a good deal for us, we will keep you to the promise you made: to adhere to your part of the deal and send us the secret of Mysticism. In return, we will teach you the secret of Warrior Code and tell you what we are currently researching to pursue a continuation of our relationship. Your proposal of having us pay additional gold will not win support amongst our people, and I will therefore not waste time discussing it. I am hereby already compensating you more than a number of Lux citizens think is necessary.
My plans for the future are as follows: we tell each other what we are researching, and try to research different branches of the tech tree. Then, we trade techs on a 1-to-1 basis, with an amount of gold to balance the book. Let me know what you think about this and how we can come to a good formula for the amount of gold.
I also have another option for a trade for right now. We can get you in contact with the mighty Roleplay team, if you get us in contact with Gathering Storm. Let me know what you think about this one!
I hope we can settle our differences, and look towards a bright Lux-Vox-future!
BFM
Last edited by Beta on 07-02-2003 at 05:12
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I think we should hol dout for a bit
than trade (probably)
but after we trade to GoW
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
hmm, I think that we shuold be able to put our mark on that continent
get the 4 naitons warring, than pick off the losers (And make sure we get the cities)
JOn Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:25
|
|
in the other thread I mentioned we should get warrior code from Lux.
the mysticism/warrior code trade (with Iron working which they gave us). I am happy with this. I would like to complete the "deal". In the future we won't agree to a deal that benefits them more than us.
We should contact Gathering Storm. I'm going to send them a quick PM to see if they had anything in mind. I was not there for the chat session, so I have no idea what we did or did not agree to there. I haven't heard from Jon lately. Did we arrange any more trade agreements with GS?
PM sent to nbarclay just now. We should await any response before playing our turn. I don't want to waste research.
Last edited by Dis on 08-02-2003 at 13:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|