 |
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by zeit
I don't think it's a good idea- we tell them we're not interested in the tech, but want to know when they're done researching it?
|
The trick is to first ask whether they're done researching it already, wait for their reply, and afterwards reply with an ambiguous message such as this: (wording should be made prettier and "diplomatic", of course) after much discussion and debate inside the team, we decided not to purchase Philosophy from your team. We have already made some investments into Philosophy, before we received your offer, and we would not like to waste the resources that we have already invested into acquiring Philosophy. However, we would be like to deal with you for the contact with Legoland.
Pretty ambiguous, I think. Does this mean that they paid some other civ for Philosophy, or that they've already begun researching it themselves? They'll never know, and they'll be so busy trying to guess what we did that they won't realized that we actually queried them for a hint for where they got Philosophy from.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:26
|
|
The latest messages from Lego have verified that GoW have indeed broken the clause prohobiting the distribution of CoL for a duration of 10 turns. However, Lego have asked that we do not let this surface, or this would severe their relations with GoW...
IMHO the best course of action would be to give Vox a call and ask to participate in their 40g for Map Making deal with GoW and contribute 20g. Once MM is acquired through this deal, we inform GoW that we have discovered indirectly, by comparing information from multiple sources, that they have broken our treaty and we do not intend to complete this deal and are going to keep the 100 gold guarantee. That way, the deal with GoW effectively changes from CoL + 30g for MM to CoL for MM + 80g.
Of course, this plan is completely irrelevant if we have already completed the deal with GoW in-game, which, IIRC, we have. Such a shame...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
My advice:
- first of all, we need to do anything possible to keep legoland out of this. This also includes that I don't think it would be polite of us if we tell them we know from legoland that they got CoL from GoW.
- Second, there is no way GoW is going to get away with this. They need to pay
- Third, I think there is no option to recall the previous deal, and even if there was, I wouldn't consider it honorably. So no changes in our initial deal, as it will reflect bad on us.
- I would post a message to GoW (as mentioned in my message to lego):
quote: How come we get a message from legoland, in which they claim they are starting on republic, if you are the only ones in contact with them, and it is extremely unlikely they researched CoL themselves? Did you breach your own no-whoring clause? You still have 9 turns left before you are allowed to trade CoL onwards! We expect some compensation for this, if you want to regain our trust, or it won't be likely we are going to trade with you again. Make your own analysis on which team will get disadvantaged most from this possible embargo. It is highly unfortunate that this has happened, we considered GoW as one of the more honorabe teams, but it seems we were mistaken. |
- Timing is critical, though. If we want to avoid the legos being disadvantaged, we need to make sure they do get CoL before we demand anything from GoW, or their deal is going to be delayed, and we have to deal with an angry legoland.
- Also, I think we should be firm in our message to GoW, however not too firm. We could use them later on, I don't want to p!ss them off...
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aeson
|
 |
orangesoda
Nov 2001 time: 22:26
|
|
It's funny how teams will shoot themselves in the foot by trying to be too cute with their diplomacy. We were fine without the no-whoring clause, and they pushed it onto us just to break the deal... Now both we and Lego are going to be more careful in deals with GoW.
I think we should either 'let it pass' (on the surface) for now, or explain to GoW that we don't believe that Lego was able to research MM, CoL, and Philosophy on their own at the same rate that the 5 teams in contact were able to between them. Give them a chance to confess and offer to make up the difference somehow. If we word it properly it is pretty clear that we can come to this assumption without involving Lego past 'they have the capability of researching The Republic'. Our contact on this point would be better made after the deal has gone through though.
In the meantime, we now have a reason for any future conflict with GoW. If we end up with a military buildup in our GA to hit Vox, most of our forces will be in the N, and GoW at that point becomes a much easier target than RP. Not to mention the 11 extra 30 shield units we can expect by not building the Great Lighthouse.
I would think Lego might be looking for a foothold on the main continent, and if ND is looking for a target as well... it could mean no one ever has to deal with Riders... Lego's most valuable terrain on BOB would be what is closest to it, if nothing else, it gives them more warning time of an invasion. ND stands to gain the most useful territory. E GoW territory might be very useful to us if we end up with an FP in former Vox lands. I think it's an alliance that could work for all 3, so a definite possibility.
It depends on which direction we want to go. 'Compensation' for this doesn't have to come right now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Sure thing, i'll post it here. No offense taken. 
I'll have to say this though, i don't really like using other people exact words, unless i use it as a quote, of course. So, please post reservations, additions you like to be inserted or whatever, and i'll intergrate these. but please don't be suprised or upset if i use my own writing style, i just have to feel comfortable with what i send.
I'm sorry if you felt i was using bad wording, or over simplified language, etc. in my previous posts, please correct me and add whatever you feel like. Please tell me if you think i said something wrong, as i have the feeling i was doing a pretty good job. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|