 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I would rather give up trading rightds (they will boost our trade to further their position) and give up vassalship as part of the deal
( we will be vassals anyways as a small nation on the same content as a powerhouse, might as well make it so that we ahve to give up less territory while we are at it)
anyways, I don'/t like that idea at all
maybe we shuold have a vote
and ake sure that they know that there are seperate groups in Vox
with your offer we are gigving up more, with mine wie are giving up less but it soundsf like more
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
yah
that was what I was thinking
we need a clear voice with GS
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
are we going to fight or have peace?
and have peace with the points you sent in email with?
and I am sure that it is because of me that they said they were not debating the fine points
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
off the southern continent leaves us no iron, they could easily just finish us off later (if we were nto useful enough vassals)
I think that if we do make peace with them, it shuold be with the internal understanding that we try to set up there downfall, and that we always put Lego first in regards to who we are a vassal of
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
ok
I am here
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Shiber :
quote: What an insulting offer your friend Jon sent us. |
quote: When will Vox realize that it has lost the war and must behave accordingly?
When will Vox understand that by signing peace, we are giving up our chance of securing the continent to ourselves? |
quote: My team doesn't support that proposition anymore. We think that we can defeat all of your forces shortly. In fact, we believe that we can do it much faster than you think. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
yes
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I got a reply that an official reply should be given to me today
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Sorry about taking so long to get back to you. I hate to say it, but doves in the lands of Gathering Storm are an endangered species right now. The hawks outnumber them enormously. We are now within sight of total victory, and while we would like to get back into builder mode as quickly as possible, spending the rest of the game wondering when and how Vox might betray us again isn't worth it. The deception you used to set up your invasion was superb, but the price of such a well-executed deception is that it makes further trust next to impossible.
Vox's only real hope of survival, if you consider it worth taking, would be to evacuate this continent and find somewhere else to live (if a suitable place can be found). If you are interested in that, we could negotiate some time for you to do so and take enough with you that you can get going in your new location reasonably quickly. Otherwise, I don't see how a peace treaty would be possible.
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
They will make peace if we exodus
do we want to do that?
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Cease-fire and Evacuation
Just for your team's information, once Inchon and Inchoff were established, I don't think anything short of a miracle (or a very friendly RNG) could have made much difference in the prospects for peace. None of the GS discussion even hints that any suboptimal moves Vox might have made since then influenced our people's views.
Just as a rough outline, what would Vox think of disbanding the military units you aren't planning to take with you in your evacuation in exchange for a period of peace (say, a dozen or so turns) to focus your entire economy on the evacuation effort? That way you can evacuate without worrying about defense and we can get back to building sooner. And units disbanded in cities could even be used to help speed production of galleys and settlers. If the idea sounds okay in principle, we can work out the specifics.
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Looks good... It's not the optimal choice, but we dont have anything better.
quote: The basic plan is to see if GoW and Lego will land troops on Nother Estonia as a show of force - and if there is lots of sabre rattling from 3 other civs - GS may think twice about their aggressor role. The other civs do not want GS getting all the continent either. It is not good for them. So if we can offer a relatively 'cheap' way of making it look like it would be a one vs four war for GS - they may back down. |
They wont. From my experience with the major players in GS, they wont back down.
They think they can easily capture Northern Estonia, and as soon as they do capture it any action by the 3 civs you mentioned will be futile. Knowing that they will win, they will never back down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Well, I can confirm that Shiber is pissed off, but this is too much.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
I had a long and pointless phone talk with Shiber :
He and many other GSians are again deeply insulted by Beta's "twisting of the truth".
A lot of emotional bla bla.
They have lots of troops in Galleys on the way to Elipolis. He was very surprised when I told him all the defenders in Inchon but 1 are dead.
Basically he said he supports the evacuation agreement and that the turns number can be negotiated(I said that 12 is not enough), but that the latest public announcement pissed off many people in GS and they no longer care about anything and just want to destroy us. Supposedly they try to maintain very high honor standards and our "lies" and "disinformation" hurts them personally and influences the way people think about GS members out of the game. This is why they want a chat, to clean their name.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|