 |
|  |
 |
|
Sarsstock
|
|
THERE MOST CERTAINLY IS!!!!!!!
Nothing against the proud ANZAC of course, Canada and Austrailia have very distinct cultures and heritage, as well as many similarities. Yet both without hesitation fought side by side with the Empire in times of war this century. The fact that each nation has their own infantry only represents the contribution each nation paid in blood in a century of warfare. We both paid a much higher price per capita than your average nation did.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Eivind IV
|
 |
History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.
Aug 2002 time: 06:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Case
That's correct. The song is about Australian conscripts being sent to the Vietnam War. It has no connection whatsoever with WW1.
|
Listen to the text and you'll soon understand they sing about ww1.
"...Then in 1915, me country said son: It's time to stop rambling, there's work to be done. So they give me a tin hat and they gave me a gun, and they sent me away to the war..."
"...we sailed off for Gallipoli..."
"...How well I remember that terrible day, when our blood stained the sand and the water. And how in that hell they call Sula Bay, we were butchered like lambes at the slaughter..."
"...Johnny Turk he was ready, he primed himself well. He rained us with bullets, and he shored us with shell. And in 5 minutes flat we were all blown to hell, then he blew oss home to Australia..."

Sorry for the thread jack, but I just released the beta for 'La Belle Epoque', and would love to get some beta testers 
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...threadid=109306
Last edited by Eivind IV on 15-03-2004 at 15:56
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
curtsibling
|
 |
of the Kill!
May 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by fairline
Curt: I think the MkIV is a better choice for generic tank; the FT-17 was definitely second-generation, and it would be a little like using a Panther as a generic WW2 tank IMHO. If there is a free slot (!) you could perhaps use it as an upgrade to the MkIV, with twice the speed (or range if it's a missile unit).
I would still not give the Germans a tank if I were you. The A7V was a complete disaster - so much so that only about 20 were ever made. it's pitiful ground clearance and huge weight made it virtually immobile on the battlefield, and it's great height made it unstable (some even fell over ). Personally, I'd go with the idea of stormtroopers as the German equivalent to the Entente tanks - with perhaps a tech called 'infiltration tactics' or some-such as a preq.
BTW, I have already started a MkIV today, but got side-tracked when the footy came on the telly |
Hi there, fairline!
I had two ideas, limited by unit space.
One was to have the generic MKIV as a 'disposable' attacker - to be upgraded to the FT17 for heavier action.
This weapon would be available to all...
On the other hand is specialised units - giving the MKIV to the Entente - and the STs to the Germans.
This would leave the way open for the Centrals to develop the massive Krupps gun, as a special trench breaker.
Option two is where I am heading, methinks - The ST could be a match for the tank,
but, like all troops - not very defendable against the iron monsters!

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sarsstock
|
|
Curt I frankly agree that the German Storm Trooper instead of the tank is the most historically acurate idea.
If only you were able to use Fairline's amazing Ft-17 tank, I think that was the desegnation. The scenario you've created Curt would be just perfect for its use, however I respect the fact that this scenario is about the men, not the machines. Who afterall did nearly all of the killing and nearly all of the dying.
Last edited by Sarsstock on 16-03-2004 at 01:25
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|